There is a
National March for the Hostages this Sunday. Click here to register and be sent the start location. We gather from 2pm and march to
Downing Street for a rally at 4pm.
The March
is organised by the Board of Deputies and sponsored by all (non-Chareidi)
religious denominations, including Masorti Judaism, as well as communal
leadership organisations and the Hostages and Missing Families Forum. The awful
photos that have emerged of starving hostages in inhuman conditions are
appalling. We call for the immediate unconditional release of all hostages,
alive and dead. This, of course, is uncontroversial.
Original
publicity for the March also included a call to Prime Minister Starmer to
condition the recognition of a Palestinian state on the release of hostages,
stating that doing otherwise risks legitimising extremism. This, of course, is
arguable, but not uncontroversial.
And the
original publicity for March featured one sponsor with a clear Israeli
political affiliation, Herut Anglia – associated with Israel’s Likud party.
This, I would argue, was a mistake.
Subsequent
publicity has refocused solely on the question of releasing the hostages.
“We are
united in one clear, urgent demand: the immediate and unconditional release of
all hostages. Regardless of our diverse political views, this is not a
political issue - it is a human one. It transcends party lines, ideologies, and
national borders.
Just as in
British society, where differing views on government coexist, so too in Israel
- a vibrant democracy where debate is a sign of strength, not weakness. The
march on Sunday is a powerful testament to that democratic spirit, and to our
community's unwavering commitment to the hostages and their families. Our
collective voice is unwavering in calling for their safe return: Bring Them
Home Now!
The time is
now. The hostages don't have time to lose. We need everyone there!”
Herut’s
sponsoring logo has been removed. Arms have been twisted; communal politics at
work. This, I argue, is good news.
I don’t
think this is a minor issue. Of course, it pales in comparison to the
experience of 671 days of capture and now starvation. But we are watching the
British Jewish Community work out the relationship between love of Israel in
its totality and support of its government. I’m often pulled into these
arm-twisting encounters. I think they are healthy. The sad reality, of course,
is that there is no such thing as ‘simply’ showing full support for Israel
without expressing a position on the proper response to the invasion of 7th
October, not even when it comes to the question of the hostages. While the
responsibility for the capture and imprisonment of the hostages could not be
clearer – Hamas and her allies deserve our utter condemnation – the reason the
hostages remain in captivity is more complex. The leadership provided by Prime
Minister Netanyahu is political. The right wing of his cabinet has been
extremely political. So too are the campaigning efforts of more progressive
voices. We shouldn’t be shying away from politics. And we certainly shouldn’t
shy from seeking to engage across lines of disagreement. I encourage all to
attend the rally on Sunday.
Two weeks
ago, I offered to speak with those who take a different position from me on the
question of a public letter critiquing the Israeli government in its pursuit of
this war. Several of you reached out, and we’ve spoken. Thank you. We have had
frank political disagreement. I have much to reflect upon. I’ve also been told
that publicly criticising the government of Israel is immoral, un-Jewish, or
doing Hamas’ work. I simply don’t accept that. For the past three weeks we have
read Jeremiah’s critique of the first Israelite state. Trenchant doesn’t come
close. Just before that we read the verse that calls us to Truly critique
your fellow. Judaism has never valued uniformity.
In this
year of marking the 80th Anniversary of the end of the World War II,
I’ve been reflecting on Winston Churchill’s speech to parliament on VE Day, “The
strength of the Parliamentary institution has been shown to enable it, at the
same moment, to preserve all the title-deeds of democracy while waging war in
the most stern and protracted form.” War shouldn’t stifle debate. We are not
weaker when we disagree.
In this week of marking the 80th Anniversary of
the bombing of Hiroshima, I, like many of us, I know, am struck by the still
echoing uncertainty of the result of the dropping of that bomb; moral stain or
necessary herald of an era of peace. These things are worth arguing about.
Lives – and every life is sacred – are at stake.
May peace come. May the hostages be released,
Shabbat Shalom,
No comments:
Post a Comment