Thursday, 11 August 2011

Looking for Cheder Teachers

Dear All,

New London are looking for Cheder teachers, specifically early years teachers.
If you are interested please do be in touch with Jo Velleman on director@newlondon.org.uk.
If you know someone who might be, please do pass this on.

Thanks,

Rabbi Jeremy

CHEDER TEACHERS

 

We are re-launching our Cheder under the expert eye of Angela Gluck, one of the country’s leading Jewish educators. This is an exciting opportunity for those who care about the Jewish education of our children. Our intake is from 3 years old up and includes a B’nei Mitzvah programme.

 

We are seeking Cheder teachers to start on Sunday 18th September 2011. There will be an important whole-team meeting and training session on Sunday 4th September.

 

Y     Do you enjoy the company of children and young people? Do you want to help them grow Jewishly?

Y     Are you willing to work within a strong Masorti ethos that values the best in both Jewish tradition and modernity—and the interaction between them?

Y     Do you believe that Jewish education is a life-long process and that a bank of positive childhood memories is its firmest foundation?

Y     Are you willing to develop as a Jewish educator, whatever your experience to date?

Y     Do you thrive on challenge? And do you have a sense of fun?

 

If yes, and you’d like to be involved in our Cheder, do get in touch with us. We’re especially interested to hear from you if you have experience teaching children aged 3 to 5 years. Please feel free to pass this on to others who might wish to develop themselves through developing our cheder.

 

Please phone the Executive Director, Jo Velleman on 020 7328 1026 between 9.00am and 1.00pm Monday to Friday or email director@newlondon.org.uk Applications are needed by Friday 19th August. Interviews will be held on the morning of Wednesday 24th August but we are willing to be flexible about this date, if it clashes with pre-existing holiday arrangements. 

 

 

New London Synagogue

33 Abbey Road

London NW8 0AT

0207 328 1026

Wednesday, 10 August 2011

Two Jews - Fierce Opinions

 

On the 3rd we will be doing something new. There will be an egalitarian full service in the Synagogue and a non-egalitarian full service in the Kiddush Hall as we celebrate a Bar Mitzvah. It’s something we are doing, as many members will know, as a result of extensive discussions and an EGM. More information is on the website at www.newlondon.org.uk/egm

 

I’ve been watching a video report of the mass demonstrations for ‘Tzedek Chavrati’ – social justice, in the streets of Tel Aviv. Hundreds of thousands of Israelis from right across every religious and political spectrum have been protesting against the difficulties they face in owning property or earning anything more than a minimum wage. The piece of the video that really caught my attention came when a group of settlers joined the protest. They were heckled by a presumably anti-settlement protestor. An argument broke out, between Jews, each calling the other, variously, Nazis, Antisemites and Fascists. It gets ugly, but in the next piece of the video another protester explains that while she is opposed to the settlers, she’s happy to see them joining in the protest, so the whole people can come together.

 

The point is this. Agreement is not a necessary part of being involved in any Jewish society, be it Israel or New London. The necessary part of being involved in Jewish society is knowing that it is more important to stand together than to allow strong held opposing views to weaken the whole. There is a word used in Arabic – umma – to refer to the totality of Muslim people. It shares, of course, an etymological root with the Hebrew term – ‘am – and a grammatical peculiarity shared by English term – people – they are all in the singular. A successful community finds ways to disagree and nonetheless stand together.

 

Shabbat shalom

Honour of the Community

 

 

Next Shabbat will mark the first time we will have held an egalitarian Shabbat morning service in the Synagogue at New London. A parallel non-egalitarian service will be taking place in the Kiddush Hall.

 

I feel it is important to understand the Halachic underpinnings of the decision to allow men and women, equally, to have aliyot, be it at New London or anywhere else in the traditional Jewish world.

 

The Talmud teaches, ‘All go up to make up the quorum of seven, even a minor and even a woman. But the Wise said don’t call a woman to read from the Torah because of Cavod Hatzibur – the honour of the congregation.’

 

The key question about this central text is this. Does the term Cavod Hatzibur  function as a technical absolute, or is it a description of a social reality? In other words, if a particular community would not feel dishonoured, or if in contemporary times no loss of honour would reasonably been seen to result from calling a woman to the Torah, does the statement of The Wise still hold? Those who would wish us only ever to offer aliyot to men would have to argue yes. And the Rabbi Yoel Sirkus is among the great legal commentators. While those who would wish us to offer aliyot to either men or women would find support in other places. Rabeinu Yerucham, for example, explicitly considers that when one cannot call seven men to the Torah, for example when the minyan is fully made up of Cohenim, one should call women. The Reivetz thinks that when there is no competent male reader, and a competent female reader, the female reader should be called instead it being more honourable to call a competent woman than an incompetent man.

 

Clearly in a community like New London there is no question that having women receive an aliyah represents any affront to our communal honour. Rather the test of honour in our community at this very particular time in our history is the test of respecting the differing desires and passions of our very special community.

 

 

A more detailed treatment of this issue is available at

www.tinyurl.com/readingtorah

The position of the Synagogue on these issues can be found at

www.newlondon.org.uk/egm

 

Shabbat shalom

 

Thursday, 4 August 2011

Destructive Behaviour

We are in the midst of the ‘Three Weeks’ commemorating the destruction of both first and second Temples. All are welcome to the commemoration service and study session on the eve of Monday 8th August.

 

The Talmud, Yoma 9b, is quite clear as to the cause of the destruction of the First Temple. ‘idolatry, sexual impropriety and bloodshed’  are blamed and indeed such gross disregard of standards of behaviour both inter-personal and theological is appalling. But the same passage goes on to express this element of surprise ‘But why was the Second Temple destroyed, seeing that in its time the Children of Israel occupied themselves with Torah, the observance of Mitzvot and the practice of loving kindness? Why was the Temple destroyed? Because there was groundless hatred. This teaches that groundless hatred is considered equal to ‘idolatry, sexual impropriety and bloodshed.’

 

The interesting part of the Hebrew phrase for ‘groundless hatred’ – Sinat Hinam – is the second word ‘Hinam’ which suggests a gratuitous response of hate, out of kilter with any provocation. Deserved hatred, as it were, is not beyond the pale. I wonder if a sensitivity to this reading might have been part of Martin Buber’s enormously influential thesis ‘I and Thou.’ There are normal relationships, suggested Buber, relationships that are deserved, reciprocal or transactional. They are the ‘I – it’ relationships that occupy our humdrum mundane activities. And then there are relationships that bubble over the bonds of reciprocity, relationships where we love more than is deserved, where we commit before we measure. Of course Buber was talking about love, rather than hatred, but the point, I think, is the same.

 

The true power of the relationships we create lies in stepping beyond what is deserved, either, perish the thought, for hatred, or for love. So, a task for these days of mourning and memory – we should stretch our relational muscles to do something beyond what is required, beyond what is deserved so we can prove ourselves to be masters of Hesed Hinam, groundless acts of kindness and build towards a time when destruction is no longer a marker of our faith and community.

 

Shabbat shalom,

 

Rabbi Jeremy

Friday, 22 July 2011

A Masorti Relationship with Israel - and Much Else

Sermon about two things,

Even though it’s dangerous to try.

Firstly – I’m interested in what it means to be Masorti –

Secondly – I’m interested in our relationship with Israel.

 

This week 17th Tammuz

Midst of Three Weeks

Destruction of Ancient State of Israel

Breach in the wall.

Important to realise the incredible miracle we are living through.

Remind ourselves that a once mighty State of Israel was eclipsed by Roman might and that resulted in almost 2000 years of stateless wandering.

 

Good time to think about in context of Parasha

 

Gad and Reuven,

Standing on the banks of the river Jordan prefer to stay in the Diaspora

In many ways like all of us.

Living in a time of Israeli sovereignty, but finding ourselves here, in London.

 

Gad and Reuven asking to remain outside land of Israel does not go down well.

Shall your brothers go to war and you shall sit here?

Why do you discourage the heart of the people of Israel from going over to the Land.

The tribes go back to Moses, offer to lead out the Israelites in war if they can be awarded land on the far side of the Jordan

Ne­h­aletz Hushim – Halutzim – pioneers, lead out the troops –

Lo Nashuv – we will not go back, until the land is safe.

Placates Moses.

And this is exactly what happens, they lead out the troops and only return when the war is won.

 

To share some thoughts on the contemporary valence of this ancient debate.

Just as it was then, I believe it is fair to say it remains true that a Jew living outside the Land of Israel is susceptible to being challenged that we are walking out not only on the promise of the land – the covenant, but also on our relationship with those living in the land.

I believe Jews are permitted to live outside the Land of Israel, but we pick up a responsibility when we accept the comforts of a Diasporic existence, a responsibility towards those who make the State a sanctuary for all of Israel. We meet that responsibility, we repay that cost in our support of Israel.

Just as Gad and Reuven did back then, so too today we need to be at the forefront of those supporting Israel.

 

There is a clear-cut view of Israel that, God help us, is getting increasing air these strange days.

It’s the voice of condemnation and attack.

The voice that suggests that everything Israel does is rotten.

And as bad as it is to hear that voice from non-Jews it’s particularly galling to hear Jews attack Israel.

The self-hating Jews Howard Jacobson mocks so mercilessly in his Finkler Question are not being brave and iconoclastic they are forgetting what it means to be a Jew and they have no idea of what is really going on in Israel.

The truth is it is a dangerous time for Israel.

And it’s more dangerous to be in Israel than to live as a Jew in England.

The last thing that an Israeli needs to hear is a whinging Diasporite who pokes from their armchair without the fear of living under the Katushas and sending their sons and daughters off to war.

I don’t like that clear-cut view of Israel, it’s demonstrably untrue and it’s cowardly to utter it.

 

But there is another clear-cut view of Israel which I don’t accept either.

I’ve spent three years of my life in Israel, I speak the language, love the country dearly, I believe passionately in its right to exist in safe ands secure borders. But there has always been something that has held me back.

Something that has held me back from wanting to make my life in the hills of the Galil, the ancient stones of Jerusalem or the party-filled streets of Tel Aviv.

Something that has held me back from throwing all my soul behind the more nationalist voices of contemporary Israeli politics.

 

I was brought up at a time when, as young Jews involved in Jewish Youth Movements, we were taught to argue that that Israel was right even when she was wrong.

Trained to offer simple absolute support. Open wallets, open hearts to those plucky Israelis. And I’ve never really accepted that kind of discourse.

It had the advantage of being clear cut, but it had the disadvantage of being wrong.

Never felt comfortable with the Occupation of territories and governance of people who have not wanted to be part of the Zionist dream.

Never been able to accept that as a Jew, as a fellow seeker of truth, my job is to support, turning off critical faculties, suppressing my inner voices.

 

And then there is a related clear cut voice that, to be fair I only rarely hear today.

There is the clear cut Zionist voice that insists that the only place for a Jew is Israel. The clear-cut voice that assumes that the Diaspora only has any right to exist pending the establishment of a State, the voice that suggests that now the Diaspora should wither away, that the Diaspora is a mere footnote in the central Jewish narrative of our people.

I’ve never accepted that discourse either.

Never felt that the Diaspora was a vestigial organ to a body whose every central system was based in the Land of Israel –

Many of the most incredible gifts of our people have been intimately connected to being in the Diaspora –

The Bible – given in Sinai

The Talmud – Babylon

The Mishnah Torah

I could go on.

 

So my identity with Israel is in tension. There is my love and belief in Israel and my love of the Diaspora, and my concerns about Israel.

A relationship with Israel in tension.

 

I read this week an essay by David Grossman, one of the greatest contemp Israeli authors who helped me understand something quite important about this tension.

Grossman, who was born in Israel lost his son, Uri, killed by an anti-tank missile in 2006.

 

Grossman sets out the value of wandering – which we know much about – particularly as Diaspora Jews.

Wandering, says Grossman, gives us a freshness, an insight, an ability to stand outside discourse – particularly overly nationalist bigotry. Wandering, says Grossman, is at the heart of what it means to be a Jew.

 

But then, Grossman goes on to say, we also have a sense of longing for stability – something we know about – particularly when we consider Israel.

As sense that there is an end to all this journeying, journeying since the time of Abraham the journeying across the wilderness, the journeying of exile. We want to have a home, a place we can just be, not just travel through.

So we have, as Jews, two urges; the urge to wander and the urge to nest.

A relationship in tension.

 

The importance of our wandering, as Jews, is certainly strong.

Even among native Israelis, perhaps especially among native Israelis – the largest Pesach Seder in the world is celebrated in Kathmandu, purely in Hebrew for the 2,000 plus Israelis who congregate there and at every other far-away-backpacker-filled corner of the world.

 

There are problems with lusting after wandering, always

Perhaps, speculated Grossman, the urge to wander explains why we, as Jews, can lack a conviction that we are a people of place – that we deserve to live in a country with traceable secure borders.

Perhaps it explains some of the Jew-driven criticism of Israel.

Perhaps this urge to seek out the new, Grossman goes on, explains why for centuries other people have been so eager to pin us down - determine just what a ‘Jew’ is.

People have wanted to pin us down like some kind of butterfly so we can be properly understood.

 

Perhaps, Grossman goes on, this dangerous wandering aspect of Jews explains why we have been penned into ghettos, confined exclusively into various fields of commerce, as if to make us comprehensible, easy to monitor.

 

Stunning insight.

The place of the tug of security and homeland, and the tug of being a wandering outsider.

This week looking out over the promised land it’s a tug Reuven and Gad clearly feel most strongly.

It’s a tension that cannot be bludgeoned away by argument, or solved in one side or another.

It’s a tension that must be negotiated, a tightrope walk to be attempted with care and courage.

 

So much for our relationship with Israel – my relationship with Israel.

 

What does it mean to be Masorti?

Between one pull and another a Masorti Jew is always going to feel a little uncomfortable with anything that sounds too neat.

Too clear cut.

Are we, as a community Orthodox? – do we accept the Divinity of the Torah is in any way simple and obvious – No.

But we reject the other pole of this argument equally? – Do we consider the Torah to be entirely a human series of voices, human and fallible, as fallible as you or I – Equally no.

There is a tension to our theology. Neither entirely one thing nor another.

 

Do we, as a community – hold onto traditions ancient and strange even though we cannot fully understand why it is so important that we don’t eat pig or we do light candles, this way but not that way – of course we do.

But do we, as a community – believe that sometimes some of these traditions need to be, and this is the language of Rabbi Jacobs, freed of accumulated grime and dirt just as an art restorer strips back the accumulation of grime and dirt attaching itself to an ancient work of art – of course we do.

There is a tension to our practice. Neither entirely one thing or another.

 

Infact you could cut into the thought and life of a committed Masorti Jew anywhere and it would always reveal tension.

Our relationship with Israel is made of the same stuff – tension – as any other element of our Jewish identity.

Judaism is not supposed to be easy.

Judaism is not supposed to be resolved simply.

It’s not supposed to be resolved at all.

 

This is the point.

We live in a world which is entranced by those who suggest that there are simple solutions to complicated problems.

As any sophisticated thinker will tell us – complicated problems need complex solutions.

Solutions that remain in tension.

 

Criticism of Masorti is that we fail to be clear.

For me it is our greatest strength.

We know how to stand in tension between alternate pulls.

Be they the pull between tradition and modernity, between human and Divine authorship of our holy scriptures or between our love of wandering and our desire for a safe homeland.

 

Criticism of Masorti is that it’s wishy-washy. Muddled, unclear.

Suggestion would be that if we could only side on one side of a tension or another we would, somehow, be better.

But it’s not going to be.

We will always be a people who look over the Jordan river at an inheritance so wonderful and feel a tug both to enter the land and to stay outside.

 

Shabbat shalom

Thursday, 21 July 2011

Fasting Famine and Foam

 

 

Tuesday was one of the Rabbinically mandated fast days – the 17th of Tammuz; anniversary of the breaching of the walls of Jerusalem. We mark the destruction of Jerusalem in three weeks’ time (all welcome 8th August 8pm).

 

I was hungry and found myself thinking about the famine in Sudan. I listened out for coverage on the radio and the following day’s papers. There wasn’t much. The tales of destructions of the livings of some of the poorest in the world and the deaths of children in numbers not seen since 1992 was drowned out by reports of an 80 year old being hit by a paper plate covered in shaving foam.

 

For me, as an occasional voluntary faster, the key moment at the end of a day’s fasting is the moment when I first eat, or drink again. Water has taste, an apple zings with sweetness and sharpness, it’s a wonderful experience. And on, of course, entirely foreign to the experience of those whose lack of food is neither voluntary nor short-term. Anyone able to make a donation to the World Jewish Relief East Africa Food Crisis Appeal is urged to go to www.wjr.org.uk

 

For those who would rather respond to hunger in the Jewish community I also, this week, had the honour to meet with Rabbi Abraham Israel. Rabbi Israel is the founder of Hazon Yeshaya, the largest provider of emergency food supplies to the terrifying high number of those under the poverty line in Israel (as well as vocational training, dental clinics and much more). It was an inspirational meeting, more information about Hazon Yeshaya can be found at http://www.hazonyeshaya.org and donations to their UK charitable office can be from that web-site.

 

Shabbat shalom,

Eat well,

 

Rabbi Jeremy

 

 

 

Thursday, 14 July 2011

Openning Boxes vs Normal Mysticism

I came across the story of Joanna Southcott and her box in a biography of Mabel Balthorp, founder of the Panacea Society. At the age of 64 Southcott proclaimed she was pregnant and would give birth (she was a devout Christian) to the ‘returned’ Messiah on 19th October 1814. That didn’t happen. But she did, on her death, leave behind a sealed box which contained, she claimed, great prophecies that could save the nation. The box was only to be opened in the presence of the arrayed Bishops of the Church of England at a time of great National Crisis. The Panaceans have been campaigning for the box to be opened ever since. I’ve been thinking about this notion of a box which contains great secrets that could save a Nation in a time of Crisis.

 

On the one hand I believe in the revelatory power of Torah. I also acknowledge, and love, the esoteric corners of my Jewish faith – the sorts of teachings that are only supposed to be shared with initiates. But the idea of a box which produces ‘The Answer’ – like some kind of supercomputer programmed to solve the answer to the Great Question of ‘Life the Universe and Everything’ strikes me as profoundly unjewish.

 

Max Kaddushin came up with the term ‘normal mysticism’ to describe Jewish faith. We find meaning and even salvation not through hocus pocus, but everyday action, not through miracle but through the elevation of humdrum; a loaf of bread, a candle, an acknowledgement of a passing season or new moon. Even the esoteric corners of Judaism don’t contain much in the way of practical magic. The point is that Judaism’s great secrets don’t live in boxes, waiting to be exposed, at which point anyone reading them will slam their palm to their forehead and cry, ‘of course, that indeed is the answer to all the world’s woes.’ Judaism’s great secrets lie exposed before us. Respect parents. Observe Sabbath. Keep Kosher. Give charity. Behave kindly. The magic of Judaism, and magical it is indeed, comes in the way these resolutely practical actions creep inside us crossing some Pauline threshold that connects a simple physical deed with an emotional, spiritual and religious gestalt. Judaism is not a faith of Damascene conversions. It is a faith of gentle uncovering. The process of deepening a relationship with Judaism is the process of practicing with more intensity and commitment and understanding from a deeper and deeper place these acts of practice lift and elevate our selves and our souls.

 

The English word ‘observant’ carries a twin valence no single Hebrew word can match. With observance we become more observant. We see more clearly, we see more deeply, we understand more profoundly. These are insights we gain from ongoing commitment, not from opening boxes.

 

Shabbat shalom.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...