Thursday, 10 April 2025

Elephants on the Seder Plate

  




It’s going to be a crowded Seder Plate; elephants aplenty.

 

What follows is drawn from a superb article by Rabbi Mishael Zion available here https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/how-do-we-celebrate-seder-with-the-elephant-in-the-room/  (those of us who know the Different Night Haggadah, he is the son of its lead author, Noam).

 

Rabbi Zion wrote about the elephants that will be at his own family Seder, and at the Sedarim of so many of those he has been teaching this year.

‘I travelled,’ wrote Rabbi Zion, ‘from Israel to Boston for four days of pre-Passover teaching. Everyone seemed to be asking different versions of the same question: “How can I celebrate freedom when there are hostages still in Gazaa?,” “My daughter has told us that she won’t come to the seder if we mention Israel. What should I do?” or “I want to do seder with my parents in New Jersey, but I can’t go if my Trump-supporting cousins are there.” Back in Israel,’ Rabbi Zion continued, ‘families are dreading gathering around the seder table with relatives who don’t share their views on the war in Gaza or differ greatly in their opinions about Israeli politicians or government decisions.’

At first glance, Rabbi Zion doesn’t seem to be listing different versions of the same question, but rather radically different questions. The different reports are certainly driven by different pains, fears and, even loves. But Rabbi Zion has to be right, they have to be seen as the same question.

 

The question is – “How can we do this together?”

 

At this point in the life of the Israeli State, in this current global geo-political climate, in a world where our opinions and emotions and even our brain chemistry is being drawn into positions of difference and radical opposition, this is the elephant; “How can we do this together?”

 

Rabbi Zion considers the place of the Wicked Child, still invited to the Seder, still afforded a place in the Haggadah. “The text of the Four Children,” he writes, “invites us to recognize that each child responds differently to the story of our people.” 

He then shares an insight into the Haggadah which was, for me, new.

“But what of the parental response? It is commonly understood that the Haggadah tells us to hit the wicked child’s teeth for betraying the Jewish collective. But a careful reading reveals that the Haggadah does not say הכה את שיניו – hit his teeth. Rather, the Hebrew text says הקהה את שיניו – blunt his teeth, take the bite out.

“How do we take the bite out of sharp, morally misguided or offensive questions? Under every sharp question asked by a family member lies a legitimate concern or a shared value. Recognizing the shared value takes the edge off.”

It’s a remarkable suggestion. What if we canonise, even celebrate, the questions that seem to us unacceptable? What if we could accept the question that could drive us to a sharp response were we to be at any other table on any other night, and certainly if we were to be sat scrolling through the algorithmically curated social media feeds of our lives, and instead take the sharpness away; recognising the legitimate concern or shared value?

Can we meet one another across a Seder plate, even with an elephant – or four - in the room?

I hope so, for that is the only way in which healing, and freedom, will come.

Sunday, 6 April 2025

Long Live Degenerency


My wife is doing some work on one of the fathers of modern Art Therapy, Hans Prinzhorn, who worked with patients in the psychiatric hospital of Heidelberg University in the 1920s and early 1930s. After his death, the Nazis murdered many of the artists but also included some of the art in an extraordinary exhibition – Entartete Kunst – Degenerate Art.

 

The Picasso Museum in Paris is currently hosting an exhibition of the same name, collecting together art that survived the Nazi attack on this so-called degenerate culture and telling the story of the Nazis’ relationship with Entartete Kunst. Josephine wanted to go, she invited me to go with her. I enjoy hanging out with my wife.

The exhibition is, I think, one of the most stunning and important I’ve ever seen. Partly because of the way it tells a story about what happened then, but principally because of what it tells us about what’s happening now.

Hitler, as we probably know, fancied himself as an artist. He wasn’t a good artist, he was rejected by the academy of Fine Arts in Vienna twice. And he never forgave … well millions of people. And by the time he’s become Chancellor of Germany – and it’s worth remembering he was indeed elected Chancellor of Germany in a democratic election – he’s prepared to take his revenge. And art and artists were denigrated, banished, destroyed, exiled and murdered. And in July 1937, the Nazis opened Entatete Kunst – more than 700 works were shown on walls painted with hate-filled slogans, “Revelation of the Jewish Racial Soul” or “Deliberate Sabotage of the Armed Forces.” 4 million people visited – it’s staggering really to imagine and amazing to see the grainy footage screened on the walls of the Paris exhibition of crowds of well-to-do German housewives and Nazi high officials wandering round the gallery.

The list of artists whose work was exhibited is a roll call of the greatest artists of the time. There were Jews – for Jews were among the greatest artists of the time – and the Nazis certainly saw the Jews as degenerate.


There was Chagall – this was included in the exhibition – it’s called The Pinch of Snuff or sometimes The Rabbi of Vitebsk and was acquired by the Kunsthalle in Mannheim – the Nazis dragged the art and the artist through the streets with a message attached saying, “Taxpayer, you should know how your money was spent.” I knew the art – I just, until I saw it on the wall this week, realised quite how large and powerful a piece it was.

There was Oskar Kokoshchka, whose work Alter Mann was exhibited – he lost his teaching position at the Dresden Academy in 1933 and fled to Prague and then Great Britain. In 1943, he became president of the Free German Legue of Culture, the organisation founded by Anti-Nazi cultural figures in exile.

But it wasn’t just the Jewish artists who were held to be degenerate. This is Picasso’s Seated Nude. This wasn’t in the original exhibition – it was looted by the Nazis in 1940 from the collection of the Parisian Jewish art dealer, Paul Rosenberg. But the photo of this piece was used in the book, “Art & Race” by the Nazi Paul Schultze-Naumburg and ridiculed – it was shown alongside photos of the disabled as a way of … what exactly, sneering and creating a kind of guilt-by-throwing-nastiness.

And then there were the cubists – degenerate.


And the fauvists – degenerate.

And the artists who like colour or abstraction or …

This one broke my heart a little.



This is Ernst Barlach – it looked to me like a weeping angel. It was exhibited, in the contemporary exhibition under a quote from its sculptor that read, “These times don’t agree with me, I’m not to its liking, I’m not all decked out in the nationalist fashion, my mode is unracist, noise frightens me, instead of cheering when the “Heil” sounds roar, instead of making arm gestures in the Roman style, I draw my hat down over my brow.”

Barlach’s degeneracy, it seems, is being too soft, to able to experience and present through art pain and loss – degenerate by Nazi standards indeed. I stood infront of this statue and this quote and I cried.

It turns out that to the Nazis, it wasn’t just the Jewishness of the artist, it was the richness of the use of colour, or line or shape, or sense of fun or – and this is the real point – the sense of an artist being an artist.

For the point of art to express that which cannot be otherwise expressed.

I remember Tracey Emin being interviewed and asked to explain her work.

“I can’t really,” she said, “because if I could have explained it, I wouldn’t have had to have made it.”

Art exists to say things that cannot be controlled or even expressed using what we already know. Art exists to say the things that we don’t know yet, to open up the possibility of, to those who see the art and are moved by the art, to experience something we don’t already know. Great art – and my, I saw some great art in Paris this week -  makes us realise things we somehow instinctively know are true, even we could never have expressed that truth before now – before the very moment of seeing and feeling the art in our soul.

Art doesn’t fit. To create art is to commit to a kind of iconoclasm – that word that literally means a breaking of idols. And when as a dictatorial fascist regime, a government – and I’m not just thinking of the Nazi government – demands that artists fit a pre-realised sense of what truth is, that will always fail.

And even if that dictatorial fascist regime destroys art and the first gallery in the exhibition contains half destroyed pieces of Degenerate Art – the art survives, the ideas survive.

And thank God they do.

Because if we just had the things we already understood – or thought we already understood – if we just had the science we understood at any given moment, we wouldn’t have a hope as human beings. We’d be stuck never growing, never developing. We would never have made it beyond smashing rocks together. It’s the art, it’s the iconoclasm that opens up the possibility of growth, of learning, of realising the things today we didn’t understand yesterday and realising too that there are new things to learn tomorrow.

It's artists who understand, perhaps better than us normal human beings the importance of that line from Sameul Beckett’s Waiting for Godot – “Ever tried? Ever failed? No matter. Try again, fail again, fail better.”

I think that’s why art and artists so distress the dictators and the fascists and the autocrats. Because they like things the way they are – when they are in power. And they don’t want to look beyond the things they know already. They don’t like being told they are failing.

That’s why, for what it’s worth, Jews no longer offer sacrifices. Because we are artists in our religious soul. And as much as there was beauty in that observance then, times changed and we changed and there was creativity and bravery and there arose from the rubble of the destroyed Second Temple a new idea even more beautiful than sacrifices – and certainly less bloody.

That’s why, for what it’s worth, New London was founded, because Rabbi Louis Jacobs just couldn’t bring himself to tow a party line of acceptable tings that acceptable Orthodox Rabbis were supposed to say.  He wanted to say the right thing, the thing that felt perhaps uncomfortable, made people feel uneasy. He wanted to speak truth. I think Louis Jacobs, if he had been to Paris to see this remarkable exhibition would have been proud to consider himself one of the degenerates.

I think we should all be proud to consider ourselves degenerates.

For, in truth, we are all degenerate in our way. Artists of our own lives, trying failing, trying again, failing again, failing better. All of us, a little too tall, or a little too short or a little too fond of bright colours or pastel colours of sharp lines or hazy lines or … in our idiosyncrasy and perfect individuality – we disturb and disrupt this awful notion that seems to powerful and so dangerous in our time and in the 1930s too – that we should all subscribe to some kind of prescribed appropriateness. Vive la difference.

Salute the bravery of those once did, and continue to, stand up to autocracy and fascism.

Salute the bravery of those who once did, and continue to, seek to try again, fail again and fail better.

Salute the incredible diversity of humanity in all of its forms and in its creativity most especially.

As Otto Dix, another of the great artists oppressed by the and exhibited in 1937 in Munichg and today in the Picasso Museum in Paris, as Otto Dix said,


 Restons donc ce queue nous sommes. Vive la degeneresence.

Let's be that which we are. Long live degenerecy.

Shabbat Shalom












 


 

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...