Friday, 11 October 2024

Kol Nidrei - Hope


I want to give a sermon about hope.

I’ve been thinking of the tale of the person searching for their lost keys in a pool of light cast by a streetlamp.

Someone walks by, sees the person searching round and round the same patch of illuminated concrete and asks why they don’t search over there, along, just a little bit further away, and the person responds, they can only look for their lost keys where they can see them.

I think it’s a perfect story for our time.

We are all a bit trapped looking in places where we know solutions are not.

In Sanskrit, the antipathy towards the perpetuation of our searching in pools of our existing vision has a poetic quality. There’s a line in the Ashtanga Yoga Mantra that says this - Samsara Halahalah. I like the rhythm. It means that the cycle of repeated, repeated action is poisonous.

Let me do the most challenging part of all this first.

Yuval Diskin is a former director of Israel’s Shin Bet counter-terrorist security service. He gave his first-ever interview to Dror Moreh for the documentary The Gatekeepers. The movie, it’s on iplayer, opens with grainy black and white footage of a van driving down a road. Diskin is explaining the situation.

“Let’s say,” he says, “you are hunting a terrorist and you’ve been looking for them for a long time and you can get him, but there are 1 or 2 other people in the car and you’re not sure if they are part of the gang or not. What to do? Shoot or don’t shoot? There’s no time. These situations last seconds, minutes at most. People expect a decision, and by a decision, they mean “to act.” ‘Don’t do it,’ seems easier, but it’s often harder.”

And the crosshairs of the drone footage converge on the roof of the van and the van erupts into a fireball.

“People expect a decision, and by a decision, they mean “to act.” ‘Don’t do it,’ [he says] seems easier, but it’s often harder.”

Diskin lived his life in cycles of violence - when they hit us, we hit back. Reflecting on his life he’s saying that “acting” – hitting back, might sound like a hard decision to the rest of us, but from his seat, it feels easier; easier, but unable to change the political situation, acting was, in the Sanskrit, a poisonous Samsara. The other decision – looking for ways other than responding to violence with violence – is genuinely hard, but it might bring us all to a new place.

The Gatekeepers is a remarkable movie, in which all six surviving leaders of Shin Bet in Isarel’s history, reflect on how the cycle – the samasara – is failing - halahalah. In its final line, Ami Ayalon, who spoke at a NLS salon a couple of years ago, chillingly shares this, “the tragedy of Israel’s public security debate is that we don’t realise we face a frustrating situation where we win every battle, but we are losing the war.”

Our lost keys, for all of us in so many ways, are in the darker places. That’s where we need to look but to do that we need, I think, hope.

I suspect the Hebrew word for hope is one many of us know, and we know it from one very particular place; Israel’s national anthem HaTivkah – literally ‘The Hope.’

The lyrics come from Naftali Hertz Imber’s poem Tikvateinu where the really great line, the one that sustains me against the gnaw of despair, is actually the opening line of the poem.

עוֹד לֹא אָבְדָה תִּקְוָתֵנוּ – our hope is not yet lost.

I’ve dwelt on that line this year, I think many of us have. But, as I’ve been preparing this sermon, I’ve come to feel I had the wrong conception of what hope, religiously, Jewishly, really is.

I used to think, עוֹד לֹא אָבְדָה תִּקְוָתֵנוּ suggests hope is a kind of bucket that sometimes is more full, sometimes less full and hasn’t yet run dry. Reasonable, perhaps, but, I think wrong. And certainly dangerous. Thinking of hope as a bucket with some level of hope in it feels tenuous. After all, there are those here tonight, particularly when turning Eastwards, who can feel the bucket is empty. “I used to hope,” they tell me – “I’ve given up.” What a year.

If we think of hope as quantity in a bucket, we are in danger of getting to a point where we feel hope is something we’ll just have to muddle on without.

The good news is that I don’t think Tikvah is this, certainly if seen in its Biblical context. I’m grateful to Rabbi Shai Held[1] for directing me to two really important verses that get, I think, to the heart of the matter.

Tikvah, in the Hebrew, means cord, as in the verse in my daughter’s Bat Mitzvah Haftarah - tikvat hut ha-shani, the cord of crimson thread that Rahab hangs outside of her window as a sign for Joshua and the Israelites to let her family live.[2] This kind of Tikvah is a thread reaching towards something beyond Rahab’s current experience, reaching away from doom. By means of this thread, Rahab’s Tikvah is drawing something down from beyond herself to herself; less a bucket, more a pathway to express a yearning for something beyond her immediate experience. Tikvah is the orientation towards that which Rahab doesn’t possess, not a reflection on how much liquid she has in a bucket labelled ‘hope.’ I think that has to be right. Hope is how we address what we don’t have, not a reflection on what we do.

And what is it that travels along this cord of hope? There’s a verse in Job

כִּ֤י יֵ֥שׁ לָעֵ֗ץ תִּ֫קְוָ֥ה אִֽם־יִ֭כָּרֵת וְע֣וֹד יַחֲלִ֑יף וְ֝יֹנַקְתּ֗וֹ לֹ֣א תֶחְדָּֽל׃

For trees have Tikvah - hope; If it is cut, it will renew itself; Its shoots will not cease.

The Tikvah of this poor tree, cut but still alive and preparing to Yachaleaf - renew, is its lifeforce. Tikvah is the thing that allows us to exist, even after we are wounded.

I think it’s a radically different, and far more resilient way to think about hope; as the orientation towards what we do not have, and the essence of our resilience to pain.

I think Natfali Tzvi Imber knew that too, when he crafted that line;

עוֹד לֹא אָבְדָה תִּקְוָתֵנוּ – our hope is not yet lost.

In a terrific article, Rabbi Dalia Marx,[3] shows Imber created that line as a riff, or inversion, based on a Biblical verse that appears in Ezekiel’s vision. The prophet is instructed to look over a field of dry bones and summon the bones back to life. In the text, the revived bones themselves speak of their experience of death and say this;

אָבְדָ֥ה תִקְוָתֵ֖נוּ – our hope was lost.[4]

In death their hope was lost, and now life comes back to these revived bones and

Od Lo – not so fast, there is life in these old bones yet.

I think these verses paint a conception of hope which is, again, more than the scale on which we grade exactly how miserable we feel about the Middle East. Hope is the very thing of life itself. Hope is what pulses through xylem and phylum, veins and arteries; hope is the essence of our existence and it’s how we find the keys to our future. It’s not an accounting practice. I don’t mean to be rude to accountants. Sorry accountants.

Avdah Tikvateinu isn’t a resigned reflection on how difficult it will be to make peace in the Middle East, or any of the challenges in our lives. Avdah Tikvateinu is death. It’s dry bones. It’s giving up on existing at all. Because existing at all means we reach out and tie threads of hope that take us beyond the solipsism of our here and now towards a future we cannot yet see, even if that feels dark or dangerous or foolishly optimistic. Hope is an attitude toward existence, precisely designed for the moments we are lacking, afraid or in pain or even when close to despair. It’s resistance.

Noah Ephron, not the screenwriter, the host of my favourite podcast from Israel, The Promised Podcast, told this story of the immediate aftermath of October 7th.

There were still lots of people who were still missing from the Nova music festival [and no-one knew who had been taken captive and who were murdered with bodies undiscovered]. And the soldiers and the forensic types had gone over the area outside the ground and found the bodies they were going to find. And then one professor had this idea, “Let’s track the flight plan of birds of prey and compare them to the normal flight plans and, if they are different, we’ll go to where they are flying now and maybe we will find the remains of the people we are looking for,” And they did and they did. And that idea, “follow the birds,” [said Ephron] is maybe the saddest and most remarkable act of creativity I ever heard of. A brilliant and surprising act of mourning and consolation. And families got their terrible news which was terrible, but at least they knew.[5]

And I don’t know if it feels obscene to consider this a tale about hope. It probably should feel obscene. But this is the kind of hope I’m talking about. The willingness to respond to challenge by looking into the dark places, driven by a refusal to walk away from our commitment to life in all the beauty and fragility of where life has taken us.

I think that’s why we need Yom Kippur so. It’s why Yom Kippur is the most hopeful of all our festivals, even given our fasting and dwelling on our mortal condition.

כל נדרי ואסרי וחרמי, וקונמי וכנויי,

May all those things that have imprisoned our past and threaten to imprison our future.

מיום כפורים זה עד יום כפורים הבא

From this Yom Kippur to next Yom Kippur

כולהון אחרטנא בהון,

Those things - they are no longer to control us.

We are free to hope for something other,

Emboldened to look for something other,

Compelled to hope for something other, even if that means looking in the dark places.

This is my call, don’t give up on hope. Don’t give up on saying, “Yes, I do feel hope.” Don’t fall for the repeated cycles of the Samsara, for - Halahala - they are indeed poisonous. Keep looking in even in dark places, harder places for the keys to our future, as individuals and members of this community of faith, and the broader Jewish community and the community of humankind. And live in this bold direction of reaching beyond the misery to express that sense of hope and make it manifest in this world.  As we read in Deuteronomy two weeks ago.

I call the heavens and the earth as witnesses against you this day, that I have set before you life and death. Choose life.

Indeed, that’s the only way we are going to see things tomorrow that are different from our experience of today. And it’s the way towards the year of health and peace we seek. May it come to us all.

Yizkor - In Memory of Hersh Ben Perel Chana



I want to do something I’ve never done in a Yizkor sermon before.

I know so many of us are here with our own mourning and our memories of those we have loved and lost. And that is already painful enough, without the weight of the deaths of this last year.

I know too of the tradition that, in that first year after a death, we don’t even expect mourners to attend a Yizkor service. It’s not something I would ever police, but I can understand that the experience of a death, within the year, is too sharp for a decorous moment like this one.

And I know that there have been so many deaths for our people, and for humanity, in this last year, that to pause overlong on just one lost life risks, I’m not quite sure how to express it, an oversentimental favouritism, possibly to suggest that one life takes precedence over any other life. Clearly, I don’t mean any of that.

But I’m going to take the next minutes to share, as this Yizkor sermon, the words of one bereaved parent, for one deceased child; Rachel Goldberg-Polin, mother of Hersh of blessed memory. Hersh Goldberg-Polin, was taken from the Nova music festival on 7th October. Actually, that’s not quite right. Hersh attended the festival to dance and fled the terrorists who attacked it and took refuge in a roadside bomb shelter along with twenty others who, with extraordinary bravery, survived as grenade after grenade was thrown in and then thrown out. Then Hersh lost an arm in a grenade explosion, and then he lost his freedom. And then nothing was heard of Hersh until, 201 days, later there was a video, he was still alive. Then, most tragically of all, on the 328th day after 7th October came the news of his murder.

And throughout that unfeasibly awful time, Rachel fought for her son, together with the lives of all the hostages, wearing a strip of masking tape with the number of days that had passed since his capture written on it, stuck to her chest.

I’m sharing Rachel’s words today, in some ways, as an everyman; for all our pains of love and loss and memory and gratitude and fear and anger and hope.

In some ways, I’m sharing Rachel’s words because it’s been this last awful year, and I think we still need to hear how we need to respond, even here so far away, to those awful events.

And I’m sharing Rachel’s speeches because, well I know so many of us have heard them, because they are a kind of Torah for our age. I am, I have been all year, in awe of Rachel’s strength and heart and also deeply inspired by the way in which she drew on our tradition to articulate that strength and heart. That’s helped me as I’ve done what I can for the release of hostages and fought against the darkness that has risen against me when I’ve turned towards the pain of the losses of this last year.

I hope it can help us all.

If you want to hear Rachel in her own voice, all these speeches can be found on the Promised Podcast, the “Hersh Ben Perel Chana” Edition.[1] It’s an extraordinarily moving listen.

 

On Day 33 of Hersh’s captivity, Rachel said this;

There are 240 souls buried alive deep in the ground, but they are breathing, and here I wait like Yaakov being told, here it's Yosef’s coat. It's all bloody, but just you wait. One day, we will see them all again, and we will fall on their necks, and we will weep when we see their faces and we see that they are still alive. When the captives return to Seon, we will be like dreamers, and our mouths will spill out with laughter all over the floor.

 

On day 67 at the United Nations in New York City.

 

My name is Rachel, and I am the mother of Hersh Goldberg-Polin. He is my eldest child, and he is my only son in Gaza at this very moment, as we all stand here, there are 138 being held. They range in age from 10 months to 85 years old. They are from nations all around the globe. They are Christians, Jews, Muslims, Hindus and Buddhists. They have not been attended to, nor treated by any international aid organization. And we, their families, want to ask you to look at their photos, read their names and then replace their names with the name of Your own daughter, son, father, mother, brother, sister, spouse, grandparent, and we want you to tell us that you would do exactly what you have been doing for these past 67 days to get them out. We all remain sleepless, and we all are running to the ends of the earth. We are the best actors in the world. We act like people, when really we are other beings, frozen in our acutely agonizing desolation. On Friday night, October 6, right before Hersh left, one of the last things I did was I blessed him. See on Sabbath evenings, Jewish parents bless their children to be like specific biblical characters. Jewish boys are blessed to be like the sons of Joseph, named Ephraim and Menasha. It's an intriguing choice, given that there's so many more well-known biblical characters. So why do we bless our boys to be like these two not so well-known brothers? Up until Ephraim and Menasha, all biblical brothers suffered from destructive hatred and poisonous rivalry; Cain and Abel, Isaac and Ishmael, Jacob and Easau, Joseph and his brothers. But Joseph has two children named Ephraim and Menasha. And those brothers, they loved each other. It sounds so simple, but suddenly, for the first time, we have biblical siblings who broke the pattern of hatred between brothers. And every Friday night, Jewish parents all over the world bless their sons to aspire to be like them, the brothers who didn't fight.

We are at a crossroads. And when I say we, I don't mean we Jews, Muslims or Christians, Americans, Palestinians, Europeans, Israelis, Ukrainians, Russians. I mean we humans. We can keep dividing the world into the paradigm of them versus us, or we can start thinking about those who are willing and those who are not willing. It's an idea that will require the most brave, creative, heroic efforts and strengths unimaginable, for those who are willing, amidst ongoing trauma, angst and suspicion, to build an idea of a future. We have got to learn to live together, or all over the world, we are going to die together.

 

On day 166

 

I think of Ishmael from Sefer Bereshit, when he and his mother, Hagar, were cast out into the desert. You know, Ishmael runs out of water, and he begins to die. And the text describes him crying out to God to save him. And just as [God] is about to save him, our [classical Biblical commentators] tell us that the [angels] say to God, God, what are you bananas? Do you know who this person is going to be, the father of don't save him. He's going to be the father of all the future enemies of your people... But our God is a God of mercy. Our God is a God of compassion. Our God is a God of grace, and he saves him. We are told, in Devarim, “walk in God's ways and be godlike.” And I think to myself, If God saved Ishmael, who he knew, would be the progenitor of all our future enemies, how much more so must we save our people now in Gaza, right now this morning. We have grandfathers, brothers, sisters, fathers, spouses, sons and daughters. We need to save our people. We say we are an Am Kadosh. Kadosh is a funny word. It's always hard to explain in English. We like to say it means holy, but actually, Kadosh means different, separate, special. Part of being different and special is that we will do things that seem extraordinary. For example, we will pay a high price to get innocent people back, because we value life, and we think it's precious, and that is what makes us a holy people, an Am Kadosh. And so paying a high price should be something we are proud of, and we lean into and we embrace. As my husband John has said, the price to bring home these people will be high, but the price not to bring them home will be higher, because we will never recover as a people. We will no longer be the nation who can claim to value life, and we will have to look our children and our grandchildren in the eye and say to them, I love you in Sweet dreams, but if someone comes and drags you from your bed in the middle of the night, we are not coming, and then we really will have lost because we will not be recognizable to ourselves. We will look in the mirror and see a stranger blinking back at us.

 

On day 201

 

Hersh, if you can hear this, we heard your voice today for the first time in 201 days. And if you can hear us, I am telling you. We are telling you we love you. Stay strong, survive.

 

On day 311

 

I am desperate to be able to use masking tape again for normal reasons, for normal reasons, like closing the rice when I'm making rice, not having my name change every single day.

 

And on day 332, Rachel’s gave this eulogy at the funeral of her son

 

I have had a lot of time during the past 332 days to think about my sweet boy, Hersh. And one thing I keep thinking about is how, out of all of the mothers in the whole entire world, God chose to give him to me. What must I have done in a past life to deserve such a beautiful gift? It must have been glorious. And I am so grateful to God, and I want to thank God right now, in front of all of you for giving me this magnificent present of my Hersh, for 23 years, I was privileged to have the most stunning honor to be Hershey's mama.

I'll take it and say thank you.

I just wish it had been for longer.

Part of what is so deeply crushing and confusing for all of us is that a strange thing happened along this macabre path upon which our family found itself travelling for the last 332 days, amidst the inexplicable agony, terror, anguish, desperation and fear, we became absolutely certain that you were coming home to us alive, but it was not to be. Now I no longer have to worry about you. I know you are no longer in danger.

I send each of the families my deepest sympathies for what we are all going through and for the sickening feeling that we all could not save them, I think we all did every single thing we could, the hope that perhaps a deal was near was so authentic, it was crunchy, it tasted close. But it was not to be. So those beautiful six survived together, and those beautiful six died together, and now they will be remembered together forever.

At this time, I ask your forgiveness. If ever I was impatient or insensitive to you during your life or neglected you in some way, I deeply and sincerely request your forgiveness. Hersh, if there was something we could have done to save you and we didn't think of it. I beg your forgiveness. We tried so very hard, so deeply and desperately. I'm sorry.

Now my Hersh, I ask for your help as we transform our hope into grief

and this new, unknown brand of pain. I beg of you, Hersh, please do what you can to have your light shine down on me. Dada, Libby and Orly, help shower us with healing and resilience, help us to rise again. I know it will take a long time, but please, may God bless us one day dada, Libby Orly, and I will hear laughter, and we'll turn around and see it's us and that we're okay.

 

I often think, indeed some of you have heard me say it, that the pain of loss is the cost of love. And I hear that in Rachel’s extraordinary words.

And then there’s the call for us all to do whatever we can to fight for the release of those other brave and equally each-in-their-own-way hostages. And I hear that.

And then there’s the way that the pain, the fear during that awful 10 months of captivity and even the pain Hersh’s murder, has brought Rachel, and so many, many others, to actions of courage and beauty and power. 

That, I think, is the meaning of what we say when we say of someone, Zichronam L’varachah – may their memories be for a blessing. We mean, may we be changed and lifted and inspired and challenged and may we rise to that challenge in their memory to do good in this world.

 

May all the hostages be released.

May peace come to the region.

May the memories of all we have loved and lost be, forever, a blessing.

Amen.



[1] https://tlv1.fm/promised-podcast/2024/09/05/the-hersh-ben-perel-chana-edition/

Neilah - A Universe in Which Everything is Pulling Apart



I went to see an unusual play earlier in the year. In Echo, by the playwright, Nassim Soleimanpour. An actor who has never met the writer and has never seen the script, takes to the stage in front of a 20-foot screen on which the face of the writer appears.

“Hello,” says Soleimanpour. “Can you confirm, we’ve never met before?”

The actor, the night I saw the play it was Adrian Lester, confirms.

“Can you confirm you don’t know anything about what you are going to be asked to do, you haven’t done any research into what is about to happen?”

Adrian Lester looks as if he is thinking of firing his agent and confirms.

And then the story unfolds. Sometimes the actor gets to read words projected on a screen, sometimes he gets to repeat words whispered into his earpiece. And sometimes, he’s left to respond of his own volition – it’s as new to him as it was to us.

What follows is a meditation on the meeting of two people and the story of one of them – Soleimanpour – an Iranian who fled his home under threat of imprisonment or worse and is on Zoom from his flat in Germany where his dog has a walk-on role, and his wife is losing patience with his getting in the way of her preparing dinner.

And Lester, and the 500 of us sat in the tiered seating all around, are drawn into this story of a life pulled apart; what does it mean to flee for one’s life, what do you pack, what do you miss?

And then things get a little astronomical. Soleimanpour, over the video link, says something about how the universe came into being and, projected on 20-foot video screens, we see stars and galaxies whizzing and the actor, this stranger to Soleimanpour and stranger to Soleimanpour’s script, says this, “In a universe in which everything is pulling apart, to come together is an act of resistance.”

“In a universe in which everything is pulling apart, to come together is an act of resistance.”

And I suddenly understood what the point of the play was.

And I knew what I wanted to talk about for Neilah.

Don’t worry, I’m not submitting the theatre ticket as a business expense.

The play is an exploration of the ways in which we resist pulling apart. It’s an exploration of how not to succumb to that law of physics that nods sagely as each of us and every particle within us drifts ever further apart.

Actually, it’s worse than that. The forces drawing us apart, are greater even than Newton’s law of thermodynamics – there’s also that polarizing drive in contemporary society that both compels and terrifies us. There’s a nice line in Ezra Klein’s book Why We’re Polarized. He’s talking about the way the Youtube algorithm works and, of course, much else besides.

Videos about vegetarianism led to videos about veganism. Videos about jogging led to videos about running ultramarathons. It seems as if you are never ‘hard core’ enough for YouTube’s recommendation algorithm.

The greatest marketing wizards in human history are gleefully drawing us ever deeper into silos of specialization because that’s what keeps us clicking. And I don’t have anything against vegans or ultramarathon runners, but we are also being drawn into silos of identities where we are encouraged to sneer at those in other silos. We increasingly define ourselves and our fellows not as multi-fashioned souls with a host of different interests and ideas, but as people who identify in one way in order to demonstrate our difference form those who identify differently. And in doing so we become complicit in the way in the falling apart of the universe.

What is it, that has the power to resist this particulation and polarization? Soleimanpour’s play suggests we need two things.

One is we build our internal strength, our gravitational mass. We need to treasure and celebrate who we are.

And secondly, we need find ways to encounter and build connection with others, those who are different to us and even those who disagree with us.

We find our own strength through story-telling and making and sharing memories.

We, us members of New London, we’re good at stories, I think.

We’ve got the greatest story ever told – about a ragtag bunch of slaves rescued from a genocidal Pharoah by God with an outstretched hand and a leader with slurred speech who, when the moment came, found the language we still use in our Yom Kippur liturgy today. For Moses came up with the phrase - שׁוּב מֵחֲרוֹן אַפֶּךָ – return from Your anger, O God.

Exodus is a story about the value and meaning of freedom, about the dangers and ultimate failure of human despotism. It’s a story about believing in things that cannot be seen and a story about the possibility of anyone becoming great. That’s a story to hold us together, as it does, of course, year after year, Passover after Passover.

Or, in this 60th Year of New London Synagogue – there’s the story of our founding.

A story of a decent, brilliant Rabbi who was excommunicated by the Orthodox because he preached that combining belief and critical thought was a truer and more powerful way to be Jewish, and decent as a human, than a retreating into a blinkered fundamentalism. It’s the story of how a group of people cared enough to found, and fund, a Synagogue that is standing strong decades later, bringing Jews together, strengthening its future, and our future.

Storytelling draws us together.

 Memories are, in some ways, similar; but more personal, more revealing our, knowing and unknowing, intimate self.

When we share memories and even better when we build memories with others, we open doorways into our hearts, invitations to join, to have future memories together.

Here’s something my family do every Friday night. We sit around the Shabbat table and do ‘Highlight of the week.’ The deal is you have to have one, and you can only have one.

I’m a little tyrannical about it – you can’t be too general, “oh it was all just lovely” doesn’t count and no-one’s allowed to say they don’t have anything good worth remembering.

For the sin of being a tyrannical enforcer around the Shabbat dinner table…

Actually, the other thing I, somewhat tyrannically enforce, is a zone of phone-free engagement. Especially on Shabbat.

Phones are, I think, anti-memory devices. They are perhaps the central reason we don’t make memories – too busy confusing pixels and social media feeds for love and friendship. Put ‘em down.

Instead tell stories, listen to stories, make memories, share memories. Treasure and celebrate who we are.

 

And then there’s the harder thing – reaching beyond those with whom we find an instinctive fellowship.

We, as a human race, are each other’s only hope. As annoying and frustrating and, frankly as murderous as one human can be to another human, there is nowhere else for us find the gravitational weight that can sustain our existence.

We need to seek out difference and find a way to come to terms with difference in its difference.

This, again, is from Rachel Goldberg-Polin, mother of the murdered captive from October 7th, Hersh. She was invited to speak at the Herzlia Security conference on the 263rd day after her son’s capture.

What shall I share with you, astute governmental policy experts, security virtuosos and learned academics, given that I am just a mother who, in the before, worked at a high school? I found myself wandering around the Talmud.

She shares the story of Hillel and Shammai, the greatest Talmudic Rabbis and the most frequently cited Baalei Machloket – disagreeing debate partners. Why, Goldberg-Polin asks, is the end result of the vast majority of their disputes about Jewish law that the law follows Hillel?

It is [recorded.” She lectured the room of international security experts,] that Hillel was kind and he was humble, but those qualities alone do not explain his exceptionality. The Talmud explains that when Hillel would teach his students, he would always present Shammai’s opinion first, and he would do so in such a compelling and respectful way that his students, each time, were convinced that this must surely be the way the law should be understood. Only at the end of Rabbi Hillel's explanation would he then say, with respect and honor, “I actually think the following,” and only then would he go on to elucidate his opinion. There was no name calling, no shouting, and never attempts to tear down Shammai’s ideas, nor Shammai as a person, as unworthy. Hillel simply disagreed, but only after truly delving deeply, teaching and endeavoring to comprehend Shammai’s approach. It is critical to understand the other side. [Goldberg-Polin continued]. You don't have to agree with the other side, but we must try to understand them, and I think that is what Hillel did so very well, with conviction and with deference.[1]

Magen Inon, whose mother and father were both murdered by Hamas terrorists, wrote this,

From this unbearable feeling of pain and distress, I wish to speak about what I believe is my parents’ legacy. People from both sides of the border have good reasons to hate one another. But this cannot be the only option. … Our shared future is based on the belief that all human beings are equal and deserving of respect and safety. This is how I was raised and how I am raising my own children. In the long term, and even if it’s very far away, the only real future is that of hope and peace.[2]

Or, for those who want to hear the same voice from our Muslim or Arab cousins, I could share with us tonight from, Wajid Iltaf Khan, Lord Kahn, the Muslim Minister for Communities, or Mayor of Camden, Samata Khatoon or, the Gaza-born activist, Ahmed Fouad Alkhatib, who wrote this for the Jewish News this week.

In the painful year since the October 7 massacre in which 1,200 Israelis were killed and hundreds taken hostage, I have made more connections with Israelis and Jews as a Palestinian from Gaza than I have in the entirety of my life.[3]

Alkhatib has written powerfully of his opposition to Hamas and powerfully also to ask for an understanding of how difficult it is for those within Gaza to speak out with the same forthright condemnation. Alkhatib, a Senior Fellow at the Atlantic Institute had to seek political asylum in the States some 20 years ago.

I could go on. I know there is hatred in the world, I know there is violence and there is thuggery and there is hatred. I know to protect against that and challenge that takes a certain strength.  But we have to stop weaponizing difference. We have to stop being complicit in the pulling ourselves as a single human race apart.

It's not a goal to agree with every human in their every opinion. That’s not the point. It’s that I – we all – have to come to a point where we demonstrate curiosity and strive for empathy with human existence, even if it’s a radically different perspective.

And as much as I will condemn and oppose the actions of those who wish me harm, I can’t, we can’t foster a disregard of their humanity. Because otherwise this whole thing is going to fall apart.

“In a universe in which everything is pulling apart, to come together is an act of resistance.”

I left that performance of Nassim Solempanour’s Royal Court play feeling oddly elated. I had watched in as two complete strangers had met and fallen into intimacy through story and memory and curiosity and openness and I too had become complicit in that act of falling into intimacy along with 500 or so fellow strangers. We shared furtive looks of resistance as we made our way home. In that hour and however-long-it-was, I had felt the resistance grow to the particulation of our existence.

And I was reminded of the conclusion of one of the greatest books I have ever read. At the end of An Intimate History of Humanity, a tour de force exploration of memory, story and human multiplicity and shared commonality, Theodore Zeldin, born in 1933 Mandatory Palestine to Russian Jewish parents wrote this;

It is in the power of everybody, with a little courage, to hold out a hand to someone different, to attempt to increase, even by a tiny amount, the quantity of humanity in the world. But it is careless to do so without remembering how previous efforts have failed. History, with its endless procession of passers-by has so far largely been a chronicle waste. But next time two people meet, the result could be different. That is the origin of anxiety, but also of hope and hope is the origin of humanity.[4]

May it come to us all for good.

Wednesday, 2 October 2024

A Prayer of Rebbe Nachman - Sermon for Rosh Hashanah


This is a prayer of Rebbe Nahman, adapted by Jules Harlow, first printed in a 1972 edition of the Rosh Hashanah prayerbook.

May we see the day when war and bloodshed cease, when a great peace will embrace the whole world.

Then nation will not threaten nation and mankind will not again know war.

For all who live on earth shall realise we have not come into being to hate or destroy. We have come into being to praise, to labour and to love.

Compassionate God, bless the leaders of all nations with the power of compassion.

Fulfill the promise conveyed in scripture: I will bring peace to the land and you shall lie down and no one shall terrify you.

I will rid the land of vicious beasts and it shall not be ravaged by way.

Let love and justice flow like a might stream. Let peace fill the earth and waters fill the sea.

And let us say Amen.

I’m on my third complete redraft of this sermon. The first was written when the concern at the heart of how I would address you all, my dear friends, today, was merely the border between Israel and Gaza, and the hostages, the raw memories of that day just under a year ago and the destruction that’s happened since. The second was written during the recent escalation on the borders between Israel and Lebanon. And yesterday I was writing again, in the aftermath of over 180 missiles being sent into Israel from Iran.

Like all of us, I’m reeling.

And on this day when we should be trying to act like angels, I’m feeling like a fool attempting to rush in. Having the temerity to say, really anything beyond ‘ow.’ Because everything every word – every line of our Machzor and every word I might share from his holy Bimah - feels both overloaded and oversimplified.

How awful it is that there are still over 100 hostages held in Gaza, held for an entire year, and this is only one, maybe not even the heaviest weight with which I enter this Rosh Hashanah Year.

How ridiculous it is that I, stood here in my diasporic splendour so far from the reach of Hamas tunnels and Hezbollah missiles, but also, let it be admitted so far from the devastation wrecked on Gaza and Lebanon, complain about how hard it is to write a sermon.

I want to make suggest two things, with humility and with the request for gentle hearing from you, my dear friends, the treasured members of this community.

The first is about responsibility.

Rosh Hashanah is a good day to talk about responsibility. We sing of the sins for which we are responsible - She’Anu Hayavim Lifnecha.

Rabbi Sharon Brous put the case for the responsibility for the 7th October well, Hamas are she said recently a, “deranged enemy that manipulates a just cause, the need for a just future for the Palestinian people, into a perverse sadistic death cult that abducts and rapes and massacres innocents and then hides and executes in tunnels beneath day care centres.” And then there is that other clear responsibility in all this; the responsibility that emerges from the Supreme Leadership of Iran, a responsibility for building a nuclear threat and emboldening proxies and, in the last days, firing missiles. Bravo to those marshalling Israel’s air defenses and the allied countries of the civilized world who have stood up to affirm Israel’s right to defend itself.

The fact that Israel, even in the very first days after the attack, found herself blamed for provoking supposedly decent peace-loving people into a fit of murderous attack is more than stupidity. It reveals the ways some people who profess decency, strip from Israel, and Jews more generally, the same security and the same right to determination any group of humans deserves. You can spot a racist and you can spot an antisemite by how they allocate responsibility.

But allocating responsibility in one direction doesn’t mean other responsibilities don’t co-exist.

There’s a passage of Torah we read just a couple of weeks ago about the aftermath of murder in Biblical times. When there’s been a murder, the elders of the settlement local to the place where the body was found stand over the body and say this.

“Our hands did not shed this blood, nor were we witnesses to it, but, dear God, forgive us – the word is Kaper, as in Yom Kippur -  forgive us our responsibility. Do not let guilt of innocent blood remain in our midst.”

It’s a remarkable command – that we accept guilt and plea for forgiveness for a blood which our hands did not shed.

What exactly did the elders do so wrong? The Talmud tells us the people of the village closed their eyes to a stranger passing through, missed the opportunity to provide a safe escort. Other responsibilities still pertain, even having taken account of the responsibility of the murderer.

And the complex part of all of this is not in allocating clear, primary and appalling responsibility on the leadership of Hamas and Hizbollah and the Iranian Supreme Leadership. That piece is utterly straightforward. The complex part of all of this is that there are other responsibilities that fall on, for want of a better term, us.

She’Anu Chayavim Alehem.

For the sin of failing to keep safe the residents of the Gaza envelope and those happy hippy trippy ravers of the Nova Dance Festival, there is a weighty responsibility.

And then it gets harder, and as a Rabbi in the Diaspora I watch and read and care and feel tremendous pain and also feel a humility and a sense of trepidation and I hate it when inside I feel a call to criticize the State and its leaders. But I can’t get to today, understanding what I understand about why the Gaza envelope was left so little protected, and understanding what I understand about the prioritization of releasing the captives and understanding what I understand about the destruction wrecked on Gaza and feel there is nothing to be accountable for.

I’m no expert in military geo-strategy, I don’t understand how much responsibility vests precisely on whom, but I do know that none of these responsibilities disappears just because we hate the actions of Hamas so deeply.

There was an extraordinary lesson in the bearing responsibility provided by the President of the State of Israel, Itzhak Herzog just a few weeks ago. President Herzog, spoke at the funeral of Hersh Goldberg-Polin, one of the captives found murdered at the end of August. He said this;

“I stand here today as the President of the State of Israel, asking for your forgiveness, from you and Carmel and Eden and Alex and Almog and Ori and from all of your loved ones, I apologise on behalf of the State of Israel, because we failed to protect you in the terrible disaster of October 7th and we failed to bring you home safely.”[1]

That’s a kind of Teshuvah, a bearing of responsibility that, I think, helps and mends and builds towards a different and a better tomorrow. I think it helps to think and talk about responsibilities – rather than a singular responsibility - even if it’s painful. To get to that place, the place, “where war and bloodshed cease, and a great peace will embrace the whole world,” we’ll need a level of honesty and acceptance of plural responsibilities. And, despite the way in which our world today threatens to welcome only simplicity, we each need to play our part in welcoming complexity even if it is painful.

 

I don’t have a single English word for the next thing. It’s got something to do with hope, with faith and with belief. The Hebrew word is Emunah, connected, of course to the Hebrew word, Amen. It’s the same etymology as a Hebrew word for pillars, Omnot – things you can lean on when you need something to prop you up.

At the heart of my belief lies the notion of the sacred nature of humanity. In religious terms, that we each contain Tzelem Elohim–the image of the Divine.

It’s the thing that makes what has happened to the hostages so horrendous. There’s a photo of a table outside one of the homes on Kibbutz Nir Oz of Eli and Yifar sitting alone at a table set for 6. Across from them are four empty chairs for Yarden, Shiri, Ariel and little Kfir. Yossi and Margit, Shiri's parents, were murdered on that terrible Saturday. Eli, Yarden’s father, and Yifat, Shiri's cousin, sit alone, waiting. Each one a distillation of divinity in human form. As we said on 9th Av – Al Eleh Ani Bochiach – for this I weep.

And then comes the hard part – that I have to look for the Image of God, even in those who hate me. And that means, I think, two things.

One is I need to desperately careful with all life, even the life of my enemies, and certainly the life of those who have the misfortunate to be too adjacent to enemies. There is no doctrine of acceptable collateral damage in Judaism, just a dreadful warning that taking the life of an innocent person results in a blood cry that destroys an entire world - ק֚וֹל דְּמֵ֣י אָחִ֔יךָ צֹעֲקִ֥ים אֵלַ֖י. I know that makes it incredibly hard to defend a nation surrounded by enemies. So be it. It is indeed hard. There is no good easy option, not even when I or the ones I love are attacked or displaced or taken captive. There is no good easy option.

The second thing is; I need to treat, even my enemies with the desire to get to a place where our commonality – as fellow human beings – can be of power. I know we are not there today. But the prayer, in Rebbe Nachman’s language, is to get to the place where all who live realise we have not come into being to hate or destroy.

Here’s a verse from Exodus, and it’s worth reminding ourselves that the Bible is not wishy-washy, it can be brutal and tough, but here’s the verse in Exodus

כִּֽי־תִרְאֶ֞ה חֲמ֣וֹר שֹׂנַאֲךָ֗ רֹבֵץ֙ תַּ֣חַת מַשָּׂא֔וֹ וְחָדַלְתָּ֖ מֵעֲזֹ֣ב ל֑וֹ עָזֹ֥ב תַּעֲזֹ֖ב עִמּֽוֹ׃ 

When you see the donkey of your enemy fallen under its burden, and you are tempted to refrain from helping him, help him, help him.

It’s an amazing image, the Torah verse knows what is going through my mind as I see the beast of my enemy struggling, the Torah knows that I want to walk away and it pulls me back and forces me to assist.

So what is this? Is this a sort of wishy-washy Kumbaya empathy? You can find classic Rabbinic commentators who suggest the verse only applies when it’s a Jewish enemy’s donkey and the verse doesn’t apply to those non-Jews. But this is Rabeinu Bachya, the great Spanish Biblical commentator.

The promise contained in our verse is that if you assist your enemy with their falling donkey, they will eventually appreciate you and become אחיך, “your brother.” When you assist them, they will forget the “hatred” between you and only remember the bond of love that unites brothers. (on Deut 22.4)

 

I know it sounds so very, very far away. But Od Lo Avdah Tikvateinu – I still haven’t lost hope, certainly not on the day of Rosh Hashanah where hope and hope for something new and different is at the very heart of our prayers.

Again, I don’t make the claim this is easy, or even that I know how I would approach any of the complex geo-political military-strategic challenges that face those in positions more complex than being a congregational rabbi in London. But Steven Covey has to be right to suggest we need, always, keep the end in mind.

We must train ourselves to be more comfortable talking of plural responsibilities and we must sustain an Emunah and always be orientated towards the end we have in mind.

The end must be, it cannot be anything other than the great prayer of Rebbe Nachman

May we see the day when war and bloodshed cease, when a great peace will embrace the whole world.

Then nation will not threaten nation and mankind will not again know war.

Fulfill the promise conveyed in scripture: I will bring peace to the land and you shall lie down and no one shall terrify you.

Let love and justice flow like a might stream. Let peace fill the earth and waters fill the sea.

And let us say Amen.


 

 

 

 

 

 

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...