This sermon began as a reflection on a counterintuitive idea.
This piece of cloth isn’t supposed to stop me catching COVID.
The reason to wear a mask isn’t to stop me catching COVID, but
rather to stop someone else catching COVID from me.
Mask wearing is an act of … what is it exactly, generosity? I
don’t think generosity quite covers it. I’m going to make the claim that
mask-wearing is religious. I don’t mean mask-wearing is something that can be
included in a list of good deeds we stack up in a cosmic account of boxes
ticked and not ticked, but rather that mask-wearing unlocks the very nature of
what it means to be religious.
Mask-wearing is a very Levinasian act. The great Jewish
theologian and philosopher Immanuel Levinas talked about placing value on the
other person as the central ethical call of our lives. He wrote, in the decades
immediately after the Holocaust, of the importance of placing the mortality of
the other person at the very centre of who we are. Levinas is going to stand as
an exemplar of what it means to be religious, for me, this evening.
And on the other side of this debate, between the forces of
religion and the forces of … not religion, I’m calling as witness a central
idea from the writings of Immanuel Kant. I’m going to be a little unfair on
Kant who had much else to say, but Kant was responsible for the idea that every
individual is the end in themselves, and never to be solely a means to another
end. I know that’s to oversimplify Kant, but this is a sermon, not a philosophy
seminar.
The reason, I think, it’s OK to oversimplify Kant’s
categorical imperative is that his articulation transformed so much of what we
think it means to be ethical. Kant’s doctrine of the in-alienable nature of the
self has driven human rights legislation, medical ethics and so much else. And
mostly that’s good. But placing ‘me’ at the centre of what it means to ethical
is dangerous.
If I am not to be a means to another end, I must be the most
important thing in my own ethical universe. My rights deserve to be
prioritized, my self-determination needs to be vouchsafed. Ibsen’s tragi-hero
Peer Gynt can justify frittering away their life in the search to be true to
his own self. Thousands of t-shirts and posters can be printed with versions of
the slogan, “Live Your Own Truth,” and this idea can, somehow, be cast as
ethically OK. And somewhere in all of this, that pseudo-Kantian idea is to
blame.
I mean, if I should pursue my own truth as an ethical goal,
if I focus all my ethical energy on not being a means to the
ends of another,
if I’m not under the ethical command to discomfort
myself with this piece of, let’s admit it, deeply discomforting cloth, then why
on earth should I?
In response to pseudo-Kantian claim that Living Your Own Truth
is the purpose of existence, religion sits down and has a little cry. I mean,
what can religion say to someone who has turned themselves into the centre of
ethical power in their own private universe? What should I say to someone who has
made themselves into their own god?
Religion – at least this religion – is the practice of
locating power beyond the self. Religious Jews don’t eat what they feel like,
they don’t say the things they feel like saying, they don’t do the things they
feel like doing all the time. Rather we eat what we eat, say what we way and do
what we do in the context of a covenant, a relationship with a people and a
God. That’s the very essence of Judaism – we are not God – we
did not create the world, imbue it with life and meaning and we did
not bring the Jewish people out of the Land of Egypt.
And so, the entire drive of a Jewish understanding of life, becomes
the attempt to live well in the face of otherness we cannot understand and
cannot control. The entire apparatus of Jewish law is a training in living with
this external sense of obligation.
Let me give two examples.
כִּי תִבְנֶה בַּיִת חָדָשׁ, וְעָשִׂיתָ מַעֲקֶה לְגַגֶּךָ;
וְלֹא-תָשִׂים דָּמִים בְּבֵיתֶךָ, כִּי-יִפֹּל הַנֹּפֵל מִמֶּנּוּ.
When you build a new house, you
shall put a parapet on the roof so you shall not place blood on your house
should someone fall from it. (Deut 22:8)
If I’m not stupid enough to go clambering around my roof, why
should parapet building be my problem? Because my actions have implications for
other people, and I need to obligated by them, even if I don’t want to be, or
don’t see how that could possibly be fair.
Or this one, a little less well known – the law of the Egla
Arufa; if a dead body is found in a field beyond my village, the leaders of the
village have to come forth and accept responsibility for the death. Why do they
have to accept responsibility for something that happened outside their village
- it’s not as if the leaders of the village killed the person? Rather it’s
because they failed to stop the death from happening and the empty space beyond
their village is still their problem.
I think about the law of the Egla Arufa every time I read
about a refugee dingy capsizing in the Mediterranean, or when I hear about
those left behind in Afghanistan. The people in a field beyond my village are still
my problem.
In 1972, Abraham Joshua Heschel, the Rabbi, the anti-racism
and anti-war campaigner wrote: “Morally speaking, there is no limit to the
concern one must feel for the suffering of human beings. Indifference to evil
is worse than evil itself, [and] in a free society, some are guilty, but all
are responsible.”
Much is made of the notion of Jewish guilt. I think it’s
usually a mis-understood concept. The issue isn’t that we are going to burn in
hell for every infraction of an ancient set of rules. The issue is, that our
lives are to be judged on a scale of how successfully we lived up to our obligations
towards others and otherness. By the standards of the cosmos I don’t believe, for
what it’s worth, that there are many points available for successfully doing
what seems right in our own eyes – whatever that happens to be.
That’s why wearing a mask that keeps, not me safe, but you
safe, is such a fundamentally religious act. Mask wearing is perhaps the
paradigmatic way in which we, in a pandemic, accept the burdens imposed by the
other.
By the way, if you’re exempt, you’re exempt. If you shouldn’t
be wearing a mask, of course it’s ethically correct not to wear a mask. If
you’re exempt, I don’t mean you.
But let me do a piece on vaccines also. Because while I know
so many of us in this sacred community took the very first opportunity
presented to go and get vaccinated, I’ve had invitations from members of this
community, to protest against a supposed unfairness of vaccine fascism or
whatever it’s being called. And I’m sorry for the discomfort I’m going to try
to impose on the vaccine resistant in this community, but not that sorry.
To be fair, I’ve encountered far more vaccine resistance in the
yoga circles I wander through than Jewish world I inhabit. In yoga-classes I’ve
encountered younger, fitter people who don’t want to put toxicity into their
bodies. They are concerned about the side-effects of the vaccine – and there
are side-effects of the vaccine – and rightly or wrongly they aren’t so worried
about getting Covid themselves because they think they are young enough and fit
enough to fight it off. All that may be true, but these yogis who parenthetically
seem to spend a lot of time talking about ‘pursuing your own truth’, or ‘prioritizing
self-actualisation’ seem to have missed the point that, if you are young and
fit, the reason to get vaccinated is less to prevent your own serious illness than
to ensure that there is less infection out there in the society in which we all
live. For the more infection there is out there in society, the more those who
are less young, and less fit will suffer.
Again vaccination, especially for the younger and fitter among
us, is at least as much an act of generosity or ethics or religion as it is an
act of self-protection.
That’s why I got vaccinated, that’s why I wear a mask. That’s
why it’s such a privilege to serve as a rabbi to a community who – and here you
all are in your masked splendor – get this. And simply by being here, in your
holy, holy masks embody your commitment to this idea. Thank you.
But this isn’t really a sermon about mask-wearing or vaccines.
I’m interested in something far broader. It’s going to take much more than
wearing masks, and coming to Shul on Kol Nidrei to transform the society in
which we live. It will take an inversion of the entire pseudo-Kantian idea that
my own needs are the way to go, ethically, and as a lifestyle. It will take a
whole re-centering on the value and desperate importance of living our lives
for the sake of others.
So where might one find a training in this radical new idea?
Forgive me for making a political sermon on Kol Nidrei so
overtly religious. I sent out a survey just after Yom Kippur last year and had some
respondents who told me my Yom Kippur sermons should be less political and some
respondents who told me I shouldn’t use my sermons to bang on so much about
being more religious. Sorry. But this is what we do here, week in, week out.
Prayer service in, prayer service out. We practice locating the central
obligating force in our lives as other than us. We’re training ourselves to
hear that voice, the voice of faith articulated in the language of Mitzvah –
commandedness, obligations to others. That’s who we are, as a faith community.
Gemar Chatimah Tovah.