Tuesday, 4 October 2022

The Habsburg Emperor - “A mortal, sinful human being.” - A Yizkor Sermon for Yom Kippur 5783


 


Here’s the most interesting part of the funeral ceremony of a member of the Habsburg Dynasty.


The coffin is drawn, at the head of a procession, to the entrance of the Capuchin Church in Neuer Markt Square in Vienna.

 

And the Herald knocks three times on the large iron door.

"Who wishes to enter?" Replies the Custodian of the Church, standing behind the closed door.

 

The Herald responds,

 

“His Imperial and Royal Apostolic Majesty,
By the Grace of God, Emperor of Austria,
King of Hungary and Bohemia, Dalmatia, Croatia, Slavonia, Galicia, Lodomeria and Illyria;
King of Jerusalem,
Grand Duke of Tuscany and Cracow;
Duke of Lorraine and Bukovina;
Grand Prince of Transylvania,

Margrave of Upper and Lower Istria;
Grand Voivode of the Voivodeship of Serbia


And on the list goes – actually that’s not even half of it. The Grand Title of the Emperor of Austria has its own Wikipedia entry.[1] And after all that, the monk responds, "We don't know him."

The Herald tries again, with fewer titles.

 

The monk responds again, “We don’t know him.”


And the Herald tries a third time. This time using the forename of the emperor, describing him as "a mortal, sinful human being [who] requests permission to enter.” At which point the door is opened and the Capuchin monks exclaim, "So they may enter."

 

“A mortal, sinful human being.”

 

I want to reflect, today, on the three ways in which the Herald, eventually, introduces the deceased to their last resting place – sinful, mortal and human.

 

Sinful

When the Herald knocks the third time, the successful time, they introduce the deceased as sinful. That doesn’t strike me as a very Jewish.

 

We tend not to go big on calling people who have passed away sinners. I sin, you sin, we all sin, but in the memorial prayer we recite at funerals we say this;

 

Remember to their credit, the righteousness they have done, have mercy on their transgressions, for there is none on earth who does only good, and never sins.

 

Our sins are failings, they get in the way of the good we do, but they aren’t the way we should be identified before the world, particularly in death.

 

The Jewish way to speak of the deceased is to say ‘Zichronam L’vrachah’ – may their memory be a blessing.

 

Memories of those we have loved and lost are sometimes obviously a blessing for us, but not always. And even when memories are obviously a blessing there is something here worthy of investigation.

 

None of us is perfect, but I’ve seen – even when the journey through life has been challenging – there comes a time, usually when death is intruding on our most dear relationships, that it becomes easier to see good in someone.

 

“It was hard when I was younger,” one recently bereaved member shared with me, “but in recent years, it was easier to love and to be loved.”

 

There are so many possible truths underlying a statement like that; from parents who struggled with parenting, to now-grown children who were, as younger children, what’s the word, willful?

There are issues around physical decline and cognitive decline that ease relationships even as they hurt in so many other ways and much much more.

 

“In recent years, it was easier to love and to be loved.”

 

For many of us, we are full of deep love and enormous gratitude, but for others there is more complexity. There those of us here bearing wounds that were not be eased in life and maybe should never be eased, even by death.

 

But, as death comes, we are called to find blessing and we find it easier to find blessing – most of the time.

That’s good.

 

Memories as blessings, even rose-coloured memories, even memories that are willfully exaggerated into blessings, elevate our own lives, making us kinder and easier to love in our own imperfect turn. Memories as blessings create a sort of virtuous circle of forgiveness, tempting God into forgiveness too.

 

I think that’s why, as Jews, we stress not the sins of a person’s life in their death, but their virtues – the elements that make them and their memories a source of blessing.

 

Maybe it’s not worth waiting.

Maybe it’s not worth waiting until our loved ones have passed away or they decline to the point where all the things that annoy us, even truly sinful ones, cease to disturb us.

Maybe it’s worth looking for the blessing in people while they are still alive, and even when they are still annoying us. But that’s another sermon.

 

Back to our Herald in Vienna, their Emperor and the Jewishness of that story. The Emperor was described as sinful, mortal and human.

 

Mortal

I love the story’s insistence on the democracy of us all, in our mortality.

In death, even the greatest is, just another mortal whose life has ended.

 

With the remarkable burial societies and undertakers we work with at New London, there are no decisions to be taken as to what coffin to use. We are all to be buried in identical coffins.

There are no decisions to be taken as to what shrouds we are to be dressed in. We are all to be dressed in identical shrouds.

There are no real decisions to be taken around the order of service at a funeral. We are all to be escorted to our lasting rest with an identical service.

 

It was hard not to think of this stripped back identical fashion of Jewish funerals watching the remarkable funeral of Her Majesty the Queen. She was the proud leader of a Church, her Church, and I would have expected nothing less than the immaculate mile-long guard and pomp and ceremony that escorted her to her last resting place. It was moving and dignified and so brilliantly done. But for me, the most moving moment came when the Lord Chamberlain broke the wand of office. It was the breaking of the property and propinquity that really got me – the acknowledgement of mortality above all the pomp that seemed so true and so important.

 

We all face mortality stripped of the dignity and power of our life-time office.

In a tale at the end of Tractate Moed Katan, the great Rabbi, Rav Nahman is dying and Raba his student, comes to visit him.

 

 ‘Tell [the Angel of death], not to torment me.’ pleads the master.

‘Aren’t you an important person?’ replies the student. [‘Can’t you tell the Angel yourself?’]

Rav Nahman replies, ‘Who is important, who is regarded, who is distinguished [before death].’[2]

 

In his short story ‘The Will’ the great storyteller, Isaac Bashevis Singer, tells of a man who visited his father, a notary, to specify exactly how his funeral should run. Each year the man returns with more detail, ritual and specification; sprigs of this and shards of that, earth from here, the yolk of an egg and a silver spoon ... And the will grew every longer and elaborate.

The last lines of the tale read like this,

 

"Eventually, I suppose, the man died. I doubt whether his will was ever carried out. Most probably no-one read or serious thought about [it].”[3]

 

There is, and it’s quite right that there is, a democracy in death. Even for the Emperors of the Habsburg Dynasty.

 

And it’s probably helpful for the rest of us to worry less about the sprigs of this and the shards of that and more about the third, and last element of what the Herald would say of the Emperor as he knocked on the gates of the Capuchin Church in Vienna’s Neuer Markt Square.

 

‘Sinful’ would say the herald, and I wouldn’t agree

‘Mortal’ would say the herald, and oh yes we truly are.

And, ‘a human being,’ oh – how fortunate that Emperor was, to be so acclaimed.

 

Human

 

My mind is drawn to a teaching in Pirkei Avot;

 

Bmakom SheAin Anashim Hishtadel LeHiyot Ish

In a place where there is no humanity, strive to be a human.[4]

 

Perhaps the Yiddish works better.

 

Strive to be a mensch.

 

It’s not, of course, a one-size-fits-all demand made on our lives. The entire point of human existence is a celebration of our variety and multiplicity. The entire point of human existence is that I should be following my path towards menschlikhkeit, and you should be following yours. For this is, as the Rabbis teach, how we understand the majesty of human creation –

 

For when a King of flesh and blood mints a coin, every coin comes out looking the same. But when the King of all Kings mints a coin, every coin comes out looking different.[5]

 

That’s you and you and me, and all of us, demonstrating the majesty of our creator in our variety.

 

But there is also something about being considered a human being, even on our death, that I think we sometimes miss – even the Herald of the Habsburg Emperor missed it the first two times they knocked on the door. In fact, I think it’s the whole point of the story. We sometimes confuse our titles with our essential humanity. We think our titles are more important than our essential humanity. And they aren’t you know. They really aren’t.

 

It’s so easy to spend too much time chasing around after our titles –

 

Archduke of Austria;
Grand Duke of Tuscany and Cracow;

Grand Voivode of the Voivodeship of Serbia

 

Or, I don’t know, Rabbi of New London Synagogue, or teacher or lawyer or any one of the things we do that give us status, and income, in this world.

It’s almost too cliched to be worth an inclusion in a sermon in this, so-wise community, on such an august day, but as your Rabbi I can tell you the cliché is true. I’ve never visited a deathbed of anyone who wishes they spent more time at work, chasing the titles.

 

Even Queen Elizabeth, Queen of England, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith, and that’s some title. After she passed away, I didn’t find myself remembering any of the majestic moments of majesty – of which, of course there were so many. Instead, I drifted into Youtube in search of that moment with James Bond and that little vignette with Paddington, the moments where the human was so revealed. Sadder moments reveal humanity also; the Christmas message that spoke of the annus horribilis, sitting alone at the funeral of her beloved husband …

 

I think that is at the heart of what moved so many of us when the Queen died. It wasn’t the title, it was the fact that she never lost her own humanity, or her ability to see the human in each of us even despite the heavy weight of the title.

 

I don’t know what higher an acclaim we could offer a person, on their passing.

They succeeded in their striving to be a mensch.

 

A sinner, a mortal and a human, says the Herald of the Habsburgs.

 

‘Sinful’ would say the herald, and I wouldn’t agree

‘Mortal’ would say the herald, and oh yes we truly are.

And, ‘a human being,’ oh – how fortunate are we to mourn the human beings who have blessed our lives. How fortunate we would be to be so acclaimed at the end of our lives – may we be written and sealed for good for many, many years to come.

 

Hatimah Tovah



[2] Moed Katan 28a

[3] The Will, In My Father’s House, Isaac Bashevis Singer

[4] Pirkei Avot 2:5

[5] Sanhedrin 4:5

Hope - A Sermon for Neilah, Yom Kippur 5783


Would you help me with an instant survey? I’m going to ask you, in just a moment, to put your hand up in the air – I know, a good proportion of you are English and it’s late for this kind of schtick, but humour me.

Here’s the question, don’t think too hard about it. Just an instant response.

When you think of the year to come. Are you feeling optimistic, or pessimistic?

If you are feeling optimistic, please put up your hand. Thank you.

If you are feeling pessimistic, please put up your hand. Thank you.

OK, so this is a sermon for about xx of you.

If you just want the sermon over so you can go home and eat please put up your hand. It won’t help you know – my finishing the sermon early. Service still ends at 7:19.

But to this question of optimism and pessimism. Here’s the headline for the pessimists out there. It’s not allowed – it’s forbidden to be a pessimist.

The only time I’ve sat in a room of people and been asked the same question I’ve just asked you, I also put my hand up as a pessimist. I can’t remember what omni-shambolic run of disasters were afoot – it was a while ago. But the presenter on that occasion ripped into us.  And they were absolutely right. We have responsibilities for the world, its people, and particularly the people around us. We need to pour hope out into the world, an infection of possibility would be a wonderful outbreak for our time.

Al Chet SheChatanu Lefanecha BTimhon Leyvav we’ve prayed that throughout this day - for the sin was committed before you by giving into despair.

It's the great Chasidic teacher, Rebbe Nachman of Braslav, who taught, “אָסוּר לְיָאֵשׁ עַצְמוֹ” - it is forbidden for a person to despair of themselves. It’s a famous saying. I looked up the original. It’s in his Hebrew collection Likkeutei Mehoran. [1]

כִּי אֵין שׁוּם יֵאוּשׁ בָּעוֹלָם כְּלָל - Rebbe Nachman goes on to say – for there is nothing to this thing of ‘despair’ ever, at all.

But the Hebrew collection, Likkuetei Mehoran, is based on Rebbe Nachman’s original Yiddish droshes. And whoever was responsible for the editing or the translation breaks away, at this point, from relaying the teaching of the great master in the Hebrew to say this;

וְאָמַר אָז בְּזֶה הַלָּשׁוֹן: קַיין יִאוּשׁ אִיז גָאר נִיט פַאר הַאנְדִין, וּמָשַׁךְ מְאֹד אֵלּוּ הַתֵּבוֹת " קַיין יִאוּשׁ אִיז גָאר נִיט פַאר הַאנְדִין " וַאֲמָרָם בְּכֹחַ גָּדוֹל וּבְעַמְקוּת נִפְלָא וְנוֹרָא מְאֹד, כְּדֵי לְהוֹרוֹת וּלְרַמֵּז לְכָל אֶחָד וְאֶחָד לְדוֹרוֹת, שֶׁלֹּא יִתְיָאֵשׁ בְּשׁוּם אֹפֶן בָּעוֹלָם, אֲפִלּוּ אִם יַעֲבֹר עָלָיו מָה

And he said this in this exact language: Kein yiush iz gor nit fahrhandin! He drew out these words, said them with great power and wondrous depth and awe, in order to teach to each and every person throughout the generations not to despair under any circumstances, no matter what happens to them.

Kein yiush iz gor nit fahrhandin! – There is nothing to this thing of despair at all.

Now, I know I asked about pessimism – and pessimism isn’t the same as despair.

And I know just enough about mental health and the medical condition of depression to say just this to someone struggling with clinical depression – get help, take it seriously, trust that there are people who love you and take the help.

But for the rest of us, those of us living through whatever variation of omnishambolic chaos is coming our way… don’t be a pessimist, don’t be drawn down a path towards despair. This is Rabbi Alan Lew, from his masterwork, This is Real And You Are Completely Unprepared.[2]

Despair [like anger, boredom and anxiety is just a marker of the necessity of] Teshuvah. These feelings are so familiar to us we usually believe them to be part of our intrinsic being. They are not, and in this sacred time of transformation, while the gates of heaven are open … we can see that they are not. We can see that they are just impulses, arising for a moment, the way wind and rain and snow arise in the world. They are wind and rain and snow, but they are not the world. They are not us. They only become us by our choice, by our choosing to see them that way, by our choosing to cling to them so tenaciously. We can make another choice if we wish to.

Make another choice. Choose optimism. Choose hope. Choose to have faith that when you can’t see the light in the tunnel, it’s because the tunnel doesn’t run in a straight line. Exercise the right to take control of the way we see the world. And if all that feels difficult. Try this.

Three quick thoughts.

Firstly, stop digging.

I remember the first time I led services in this sacred community, in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, the TV networks had that shot of the plane flying into the building on a loop, going again and again, until they realized it wasn’t helping. If you are feeling pessimistic about the world and you would like to make a different choice. Stop digging. Put down the phone. Turn off the radio. Try Shabbat. Real conversations with real people – you can us in Shul. Walk amongst the trees. I’m not counselling accepting the mess we are in. On the contrary, if you want to stoke fires of righteous indignation, nothing gets me going like taking a break from the news cycle only to return. Just remember to take breaks and if it’s dark in the pit, stop digging, especially on Shabbat.

Secondly, fix something. There is a remarkable moment in the Talmud. Rabbi Shimon Bar Yochai spends 13 years hiding in a cave, and he comes, heads into town and says this,

אִיכָּא מִילְּתָא דְּבָעֵי לְתַקּוֹנֵי[3] - Is there something that needs fixing?

If the chaotic nature of life gets you down, fix something. I love this tale told by David Baum of blessed memory. He was a pediatric oncologist – and there’s a job where you need to know how to hold tight to optimism and hope. And when asked if he ever got depressed treating kids who sometimes died, he would say this.

 

As an old man walked along a beach at dawn he noticed a young boy picking up starfish and putting them in the sea. He asked him why he was doing this. His answer was that the stranded starfish would die if left until the morning sun. ‘But the beach goes on for miles, and there are thousands of starfish,’ countered the old man. ‘How can your effort make any difference?’ The young boy looked at the starfish in his hand and placed it safely in the waves. ‘It makes a difference to this one.’[4]

 

Of course, it’s not just the one starfish. It’s never just one starfish – it’s a world of mutualism, if you remember. It’s the old man, and the boy and me from the first time I heard it, and, I hope, you too. Fixing things, making a difference, goodness spills out from our good deeds, even spilling into our own hearts. Getting out into the world and fixing something is infecting optimism into the world.

If you are feeling a little bleak, fix something. Any ol’ starfish will do.

Stop Digging

Fix Something

And take time to be amazed.

It is told that Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel, among the 20th century’s greatest religious thinkers and teachers, once entered his class of rabbinic students at the Jewish Theological Seminary of America in New York and very excitedly proclaimed – “I saw a miracle this morning! I saw a miracle this morning!”

“Rabbi,” his students asked, “What was the miracle?”

“The sun came up!”

This is, despite all the challenges, an extraordinarily beautiful planet. This is, despite all grumbles and rumbles, an extraordinary gift of life. Walk amongst trees. Look out at the sky. Picture the 2.7 thousand trillion mitochondria we each have thrumming with energy, even now, and be amazed. Be radically amazed.

The ability to find radical amazement in the world, and in our lives is not so much a factor of whether the world is or is not in a state of shambles. The ability to find radical amazement in the world is a decision.

Maybe that’s not quite right, the ability to be amazed isn’t a switch to be thrown on or off, it’s a muscle, a muscle that needs to be trained, and worked to be able to bear the loads we place on it through our lives. A New Year resolution to work out the muscle of hope – there’s one last thing to daven on in the Neilah journey to come.

Stop Digging

Try to fix something

And work on being radically amazed.

Embrace hope. Banish despair. Evict pessimism from this year to come.

And if all else fails. Try humour.

As many of you will know, I had a sabbatical over the summer. It was very lovely, thank you. But while I was away, I got a call from a member.

OK, I’m on sabbatical, but it might be important. I answered.

“Hi, I know you are on sabbatical,” they said, “but I thought you would want to know immediately. I’ve decided to change my name. From now on, I would like you to call me ‘spinal column’.”

“I’m sorry,” I replied, “I’m going to have to call you back.”

Hatimah Tovah.

Thursday, 29 September 2022

Calling In - A Rosh Hashanah, Second Day, Sermon for 5873



A series of tweets collected by my colleague, Rabbi Gabriel Kanter-Webber, will serve as a place to start. Over the summer, the Anne Frank Trust, an organisation working to empower young people to challenge prejudice, inspired by – you guessed it - Anne Frank, was rebuked for asking Michael Rosen to write a poem in support of their 75th Anniversary. The problem being that Rosen is no friend of Israel.

Then, in another tweet, they were rebuked for not mentioning that Frank was a Jew, and was murdered for being a Jew. That’s despite the fact that they do. Then they were rebuked for using an exclamation point when mentioning the Holocaust. And then again for appointing a Quaker as its Chief Executive.

I’m interested, today, in the way language is used, especially in the public realm and especially interested in how we demarcate between people we speak to or speak about with compassion, and people we call out, or attack or … in that most current of terminologies, cancel.

It's not just that so much of what passes for debate in the public realm is nasty.

It’s not just that, on all sides of political divides in this country, we are simultaneously being told that there is a dangerous culture of cancelling being practised by the other side, and at the very same time told that we shouldn’t accept these dangerous other-siders as acceptable parties for reasoned debate.

It’s also that the way this calling out of people is being cultivated as an acceptable way for us to behave. Calling out others as beyond the pale of discourse is emerging as a dominant form of public discourse.

I’m scared, scared as a Jew  - for this stuff will always come back to bite us as Jews, and scared as a member of a society that seems to be closing in on itself, rather than opening out.

Maybe these aren’t modern challenges, here’s a very ancient version of a similar issue, taken from the Talmud.[1]

It’s the year 70 and the Romans are besieging Jerusalem. The Jewish political leadership of the city – the Biryoni – are so sure the Romans represent the very worst kind of foe that they’ve threatened anyone who wants to negotiate with the Romans with death.

Rabbi Yochanan Ben Zakkai realises the only way he saves something of Jewish life, is to negotiate, so he arranges to be smuggled out of the city in a coffin. This is, of course, before the days of Zoom. The Jewish Biryoni challenge the pallbearers; they want to drive a spear through the coffin to ensure its occupant is indeed dead. But they are warned away. So Rabbi Yochanan escapes the doomed city and negotiates with the Romans for the survival of Judaism, even as Jerusalem is destroyed.

One of the most remarkable features of the Talmudic presentation of the story is its ragged ending. Its protagonist, Rabbi Yochanan, doesn’t emerge as a hero. For sure, he saves something of Rabbinic Judaism, but another Rabbi calls him out for failing even to try and save Jerusalem.

‘[God] turns wise men backwards and makes their knowledge foolish’ [Isa. 44:25]’ rebukes Rabbi Yosef, or maybe it was Rabbi Akiva. “I did all I could,” protests Rabbi Yochanan. He gets the last word, but there’s no valedictory conclusion, just an unfinished argument about whether negotiating with an enemy can ever be the right thing. The tale becomes a tale about the relationship between purity and possibility.

There are two sets of puritans in the story. The Biryoni – sure that no one should negotiate with the enemy  – and Rabbi Yosef, or maybe it was Rabbi Akiva, who claim that if you are disturbed by a threat to Jerusalem, you should fight to save Jerusalem, and anyone who accepts anything less deserves approbation.

And on the side of possibility is Rabbi Yochanan. Yochanan surrounds himself in deceit to smuggle himself out of the city and gives up the possibility of saving Jerusalem to achieve something. He is a practitioner of the art of the possible.

Whose side are you on? Instinctively are you a puritan, in argument, in practice, in your relationships or are you a wheeler-dealer, a merchant in the art of the possible.

Here are the advantages of being a puritan. It’s clean. There’s a comfort in knowing that you are right. For the Romans are clearly wrong, and Jerusalem is clearly right and anyone who messes with the clear distinctions between my sense of wrong and right has to be dangerous and should be avoided. Being a puritan is also, in a strange way, the easier option. You nail your colours to a mast and you just stay there.

And here are the disadvantages of being a puritan, in argument. You end up in an ever-decreasing circle of people with whom to stand. And, like the poor Biryoni, you can end up without, not only the very thing you sought to protect but with nothing at all.

I get that it feels more comfortable confronting people with their faults than trying to find a point of meeting with people who hurt us or discomfort us. And I get that sometimes we are just too bruised to handle the challenge of seeking dialogue when we are hurt. But it cannot be that we allow ourselves to descend into a society that lobs verbal grenades rather than seeks to build bridges through our willingness to engage with those who distress us.

Rebuking people is, in fact, a Mitzvah – straight out of the Torah. הוֹכֵ֤חַ תּוֹכִ֙יחַ֙  - you shall surely rebuke your fellow - אֶת־עֲמִיתֶ֔ךָ, but it’s a dangerous charge because it’s so easily done wrong. It’s so easy, in rebuking others, to create division, defensiveness and to close down relationships. And that’s even when we, as rebuking people, are trying to rebuke genuinely. It’s worse when rebuke becomes a way to say, I don’t want to have to deal with you, so I’m just going to rebuke you and then I won’t have to deal either with you or the ideas you represent.

The context of the Biblical mandate to rebuke is revealing – the verse opens with the insistence

לֹֽא־תִשְׂנָ֥א אֶת־אָחִ֖יךָ בִּלְבָבֶ֑ךָ – don’t hate your fellow in your heart

You shall surely rebuke your fellow

But then the verse ends

וְלֹא־תִשָּׂ֥א עָלָ֖יו חֵֽטְא – but don’t incur your own sin on their behalf.

What’s the sin a rebuker can commit? Surely the failure to live up to the command of the very next verse – perhaps the most famous in all the Torah –

וְאָֽהַבְתָּ֥ לְרֵעֲךָ֖ כָּמ֑וֹךָ – you shall love your fellow as yourself.

A person who finds rebuking comes too easily is probably a person who doesn’t love as much as they should.

The rabbinic teachings around rebuke are full of the dangers of the kind of rebuke that causes pain – The Talmud in Baba Metzia warns, “One who humiliates their fellow in public, it is as if they were spilling blood,”[2] Rav Nahman Bar Yitzhak suggests the teaching is particularly apposite – after all, when a person is humiliated in public, ‘the red leaves their face and white come in its place.’ It’s better to say nothing than to say something you know isn’t going help, warns Rabbi Abba.[3]

Only rebuke a person in private, teaches Rambam.[4] The Mesilat Yesharim[5] warns that, often, the attempt to rebuke a person ‘will not be heeded and only causes a person in their further wickedness. In such cases, [he continues] the only pious action is to keep silent." Indeed that’s the conclusion of a different Talmudic passage in Yevamot.

כשם שמצוה לומר דבר הנשמע, כך מצוה שלא לומר את שאינו נשמע[6]

Just as it is a Mitzvah to say something when a person can hear it, so too it is a Mitzvah not to say something that a person isn’t going to hear.

The great founder of modern Chasidism, the Baal Shem Tov, taught - “First rebuke yourself, and only after your neighbour.”[7] That’s a particularly sensitive read of a Biblical phrase that contains a doubled verb

הוֹכֵ֤חַ תּוֹכִ֙יחַ֙ – first critique yourself, then your fellow.

I was deeply moved, researching this sermon, by a Ted Talk by the African-American academic and civil rights activist, Loretta Ross.[8] She was tasked with changing the minds of Klu Klux Klan members, and she began thinking, in her words – what the hell! – she just wanted to call these racist wicked people out, and I can’t say I blame her.

But she’s emerged in the decades since believing in the possibility of changing minds by NOT calling people OUT, but instead calling people IN. Calling people in, she says, is pretty similar to calling people out. It’s just done with love. It prioritises finding points of meeting and opening conversation up above point scoring and bravado.

When we are disturbed by another person, we have the decision of whether we speak out, but also, how we speak out. We need to decide if we are going to speak out to strengthen our own sense of how right we are or whether we want to engage and change the realities in which we live.

When Loretta Ross teaches this practice of calling other people in, she talks about the importance of empathy and self-assessment as we prepare to deal with people who have done things to frustrate or hurt us. She talks about how calling people in re-affirms our sense of optimism, that change is possible, and broken relationships can be healed. But none of that can happen when we are more excited about how well we can put other people down, than the possibility of finding a point of meeting, even with those with whom we disagree.

Language is, we believe as Jews, the way of the creation of the world, it’s the tool for the revelation of God’s will to humanity. It’s the greatest and most powerful tool we have to do good in the world.

In this year to come, I want to urge us all to turn towards a language of love, compassion and bridge-building, even in our disagreement and even in our discomfort with some of those with whom we are called to debate.

If we see that which is wrong, we can, indeed we are called to rebuke, but only in love – and if we can’t rebuke with the love we have for our fellow being so clear to them, then we should learn, instead, the importance of knowing when not to speak.

Shannah Tovah



[1] Gittin 52a & sub

[2] BM 58b

[3] Yevamot 65b

[4] MT HD 6:7

[5] 20:14

[6] Yevamot 65b

[7] Cited in Iturei Torah Vol. 4, p.112, Toldot Yaacov Yosef, Chayye Sara

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...